Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 49

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

World of code: enabling a research workflow for mining and analyzing the universe of open source VCS data

Ma, Yuxing, Dey, Tapajit, Bogart, Chris, Amreen, Sadika, Valiev, Marat, Tutko, Adam, Kennard, David, Zaretzki, Russell, Mockus, Audris·2021·Empirical Software Engineering
DOI 10.1007/s10664-020-09905-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10664-020-09905-9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. Abadi DJ (2009) Data management in the cloud: limitations and opportunities. IEEE Data Eng Bull 32(1):3–12
  2. Agrawal S, Narasayya V, Yang B (2004) Integrating vertical and horizontal partitioning into automated physical database design. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data. ACM, pp 359–370 · DOI
  3. Amreen S, Mockus A, Bogart C, Zhang Y, Zaretzki R (2019) Alfaa: active learning fingerprint based anti-aliasing for correcting developer identity errors in version control data. arXiv:1901.03363 · arXiv
  4. Amreen S, Mockus A, Zaretzki R, Bogart C, Zhang Y (2020) ALFAA: Active Learning Fingerprint based Anti-Aliasing for correcting developer identity errors in version control systems. Empir Softw Eng 25(2):1136–1167 · DOI
  5. Bajracharya S, Ossher J, Lopes C (2014) Sourcerer: an infrastructure for large-scale collection and analysis of open-source code. Sci Comput Program 79:241–259 · DOI
  6. Bevan J, Whitehead EJ Jr, Kim S, Godfrey M (2005) Facilitating software evolution research with kenyon. ACM SIGSOFT Softw Eng Notes 30(5):177–186 · DOI
  7. Bird C, Gourley A, Devanbu P, Gertz M, Swaminathan A (2006) Mining email social networks. In: Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on mining software repositories, MSR ’06. https://doi.org/10.1145/1137983.1138016. ACM, New York, pp 137–143 · DOI
  8. Bird C, Rigby PC, Barr ET, Hamilton DJ, German DM, Devanbu P (2009) The promises and perils of mining git. In: 6th IEEE international working conference on mining software repositories, 2009. MSR’09. IEEE, pp 1–10 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Budde R, Kautz K, Kuhlenkamp K, Züllighoven H (1992) Prototyping. In: Prototyping. Springer, pp 33–46 · DOI
  10. Chacon S, Straub B (2014) Pro git. Springer Nature, Berlin · DOI
  11. Coelho J, Valente MT, Silva LL, Shihab E (2018) Identifying unmaintained projects in github. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement. ACM · DOI
  12. Czerwonka J, Nagappan N, Schulte W, Murphy B (2013) Codemine: building a software development data analytics platform at microsoft. IEEE Softw 30(4):64–71 · DOI
  13. Dey T, Mockus A (2018a) Are software dependency supply chain metrics useful in predicting change of popularity of npm packages?. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on predictive models and data analytics in software engineering. ACM, pp 66–69 · DOI
  14. Dey T, Mockus A (2018b) Modeling relationship between post-release faults and usage in mobilesoftware. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on predictive models and data analytics in software engineering, pp 56–65 · DOI
  15. Dey T, Mockus A (2020b) Deriving a usage-independent software quality metric. Empir Softw Eng 25(2):1596–1641 · DOI
  16. Dey T, Mockus A (2020c) Effect of technical and social factors on pull request quality for thenpm ecosystem. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement (ESEM), pp 1–11 · DOI
  17. Dey T, Ma Y, Mockus A (2019a) Patterns of effort contribution and demand and user classification based on participation patterns in npm ecosystem. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth international conference on predictive models and data analytics in software engineering, pp 36–45 · DOI
  18. Dey T, Ma Y, Mockus A (2019b) Patterns of effort contribution and demand and user classification based on participation patterns in npm ecosystem. arXiv:1907.06538 · DOI
  19. Dey T, Mousavi S, Ponce E, Fry T, Vasilescu B, Filippova A, Mockus A (2020b) Detecting and characterizing bots that commit code. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on mining software repositories, pp 209–219 · DOI
  20. Dey T, Karnauch A, Mockus A (2020c) Representation of developer expertise in open source software. arXiv:2005.10176 · DOI
  21. Dey T, Vasilescu B, Mockus A (2020d) An exploratory study of bot commits. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd international conference on software engineering workshops, pp 61–65 · DOI
  22. Di Cosmo R, Zacchiroli S (2017) Software heritage: why and how to preserve software source code. In: iPRES 2017: 14th international conference on digital preservation. Kyoto, Japan. https://www.softwareheritage.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/ipres-2017-swh.pdfhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01590958
  23. Ducasse S, Gîrba T, Nierstrasz O (2005) Moose: an agile reengineering environment. In: ACM SIGSOFT software engineering notes, vol 30. ACM, pp 99–102 · DOI
  24. Dyer R (2013) Task fusion: improving utilization of multi-user clusters. In: Proceedings of the 2013 companion publication for conference on Systems, programming, & applications: software for humanity, SPLASH SRC, pp 117–118 · DOI
  25. Dyer R, Nguyen HA, Rajan H, Nguyen TN (2013) Boa: a language and infrastructure for analyzing ultra-large-scale software repositories. In: Proceedings of the 35th international conference on software engineering, ICSE’13, pp 422–431 · DOI
  26. Dyer R, Nguyen HA, Rajan H, Nguyen TN (2015a) Boa: An enabling language and infrastructure for ultra-large-scale msr studies. In: The art and science of analyzing software data. Morgan Kaufmann, pp 593–621 · DOI
  27. Dyer R, Nguyen HA, Rajan H, Nguyen TN (2015b) Boa: ultra-large-scale software repository and source-code mining. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 25(1):7:1–7:34 · DOI
  28. Dyer R, Rajan H, Nguyen TN (2013) Declarative visitors to ease fine-grained source code mining with full history on billions of AST nodes. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on generative programming: concepts & experiences, GPCE, pp 23–32 · DOI
  29. Eastlake 3rd D, Jones P (2001) Us secure hash algorithm 1 (sha1). Tech. rep · DOI
  30. Fry T, Dey T, Karnauch A, Mockus A (2020) A dataset and an approach for identity resolution of 38 million author ids extracted from 2b git commits. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on mining software repositories, pp 518–522 · DOI
  31. German D, Mockus A (2003) Automating the measurement of open source projects. In: Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on open source software engineering. University College Cork Cork Ireland, pp 63–67
  32. Gorton I, Bener AB, Mockus A (2016) Software engineering for big data systems. IEEE Softw 33(2):32–35 · DOI
  33. Gousios G (2013) The ghtorrent dataset and tool suite. In: Proceedings of the 10th working conference on mining software repositories, MSR ’13. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2487085.2487132. IEEE Press, Piscataway, pp 233–236
  34. Gousios G, Pinzger M, Deursen AV (2014) An exploratory study of the pull-based software development model. In: Proceedings of the 36th international conference on software engineering. ACM, pp 345–355 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Gousios G, Spinellis D (2009) Alitheia core: an extensible software quality monitoring platform. In: IEEE 31st international conference on software engineering, 2009. ICSE 2009. IEEE, pp 579–582 · DOI
  36. Gousios G, Spinellis D (2012) Ghtorrent: Github’s data from a firehose. In: 2012 9th ieee working conference on mining software repositories (msr). IEEE, pp 12–21 · DOI
  37. Gousios G, Vasilescu B, Serebrenik A, Zaidman A (2014) Lean ghtorrent: Github data on demand. In: Proceedings of the 11th working conference on mining software repositories. ACM, pp 384–387 · DOI
  38. Gousios G, Zaidman A (2014) A dataset for pull-based development research. In: Proceedings of the 11th working conference on mining software repositories. ACM, pp 368–371 · DOI
  39. Hackbarth R, Mockus A, Palframan J, Weiss D (2010) Assessing the state of software in a large enterprise. J Empir Softw Eng 10(3):219–249 · DOI
  40. Howison J, Conklin M, Crowston K (2006) Flossmole: a collaborative repository for floss research data and analyses. Int J Info Technol Web Eng (IJITWE) 1(3):17–26 · DOI
  41. Hung CS, Dyer R (2020) Boa views: easy modularization and sharing of msr analyses. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on mining software repositories, pp 147–157
  42. Kalliamvakou E, Gousios G, Blincoe K, Singer L, German DM, Damian D (2014) The promises and perils of mining github. In: Proceedings of the 11th working conference on mining software repositories, MSR 2014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2597073.2597074. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 92–101 · DOI
  43. Kim S, Zimmermann T, Kim M, Hassan AE, Mockus A, Gîrba T, Pinzger M, Jr. EJW, Zeller A (2006) Ta-re: an exchange language for mining software repositories. In: ICSE’06 workshop on mining software repositories. http://dl.acm.org/authorize?804411. Shanghai, China, pp 22–25 · DOI
  44. Le Q, Mikolov T (2014) Distributed representation of sentences and documents. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on machine learning. https://cs.stanford.edu/quocle/paragraph_vector.pdf, vol 32. JMLR, Beijing
  45. Leavitt N (2010) Will NoSQL databases live up to their promise? Computer 43(2):12–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2010.58 · DOI
  46. Lichter H, Schneider-Hufschmidt M, Zullighoven H (1994) Prototyping in industrial software projects-bridging the gap between theory and practice. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 20(11):825–832 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Ma Y, Dey T, Smith JM, Wilder N, Mockus A (2016) Crowdsourcing the discovery of software repositories in an educational environment. PeerJ Preprints 4:e2551v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2551v1 · DOI
  48. Ma Y, Mockus A, Zaretzki R, Bichescu R, Bradley B (2020) A methodology for analyzing uptake of software technologies among developers. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.2993758 · DOI
  49. Mockus A (2007) Large-scale code reuse in open source software. In: ICSE’07 intl. workshop on emerging trends in FLOSS research and development. Minneapolis, Minnesota. papers/ossreuse.pdf · DOI
  50. Mockus A (2009) Amassing and indexing a large sample of version control systems: towards the census of public source code history. In: 6th IEEE working conference on mining software repositories. papers/amassing.pdf · DOI
  51. Mockus A (2014) Engineering big data solutions. In: ICSE’14 FOSE. papers/BigData.pdf · DOI
  52. Moniruzzaman A, Hossain SA (2013) Nosql database: new era of databases for big data analytics-classification, characteristics and comparison. arXiv:1307.0191 · arXiv
  53. Munaiah N, Kroh S, Cabrey C, Nagappan M (2017) Curating github for engineered software projects. Empir Softw Eng 22(6):3219–3253 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Ossher J, Bajracharya S, Linstead E, Baldi P, Lopes C (2009) Sourcererdb: an aggregated repository of statically analyzed and cross-linked open source java projects. In: 6th IEEE international working conference on mining software repositories, 2009. MSR’09. IEEE, pp 183–186 · DOI
  55. Pietri A, Spinellis D, Zacchiroli S (2019) The software heritage graph dataset: public software development under one roof. In: 2019 IEEE/ACM 16th international conference on mining software repositories (MSR). IEEE, pp 138–142 · DOI
  56. Rosch E (2002) Principles of categorization. In: Levitin DJ (ed) Foundations of cognitive psychology: core readings. MIT Press, pp 251–270
  57. Rozenberg D, Beschastnikh I, Kosmale F, Poser V, Becker H, Palyart M, Murphy GC (2016) Comparing repositories visually with repograms. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on mining software repositories. ACM, pp 109–120 · DOI
  58. Russom P, et al. (2011) Big data analytics. TDWI best practices report, fourth quarter 19(4):1–34
  59. Spinellis D, Kotti Z, Mockus A (2020) A dataset for github repository deduplication. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on mining software repositories, pp 523–527 · DOI
  60. Tiwari NM, Upadhyaya G, Nguyen HA, Rajan H (2017) Candoia: a platform for building and sharing mining software repositories tools as apps. In: MSR’17: 14th international conference on mining software repositories · DOI
  61. Tiwari NM, Upadhyaya G, Rajan H (2016) Candoia: a platform and ecosystem for mining software repositories tools. In: Proceedings of the 38th international conference on software engineering companion. ACM, pp 759–764 · DOI
  62. Upadhyaya G, Rajan H (2017) On accelerating ultra-large-scale mining. In: Proceedings of the 39th international conference on software engineering: new ideas and emerging results track. IEEE Press, pp 39–42 · DOI
  63. Upadhyaya G, Rajan H (2018) On accelerating source code analysis at massive scale. IEEE Trans Softw Eng · DOI
  64. Wang X, Yin YL, Yu H (2005) Collision search attacks on sha1 · DOI
  65. Winkler WE (2006) Overview of record linkage and current research directions. Tech. rep. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ma, Y., Dey, T., Bogart, C., Amreen, S., Valiev, M., Tutko, A., Kennard, D., Zaretzki, R., & Mockus, A.
Venue
Empirical Software Engineering
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-02-25
Volume
26
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1382-3256
  • 1573-7616
DOI
10.1007/s10664-020-09905-9
Cited by
49
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
National Science Foundation (1633437)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.