The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Integrating the social and natural sciences in environmental research: a discussion paper
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While such research projects are largely dominated by techno-scientific approaches, social scientists taking marginal positions are often required to subscribe to natural scientific analytical frames and are employed as 'afterthoughts'.
“While such research projects are largely dominated by techno-scientific approaches, social scientists taking marginal positions are often required to subscribe to natural scientific analytical frames and are employed as 'afterthoughts' (Strang, 2009: p. 6).”
From What Is Driving the Water-Energy-Food Nexus? Discourses, Knowledge, and Politics of an Emerging Resource Governance Concept (2018) · cites this paper as Strang, 2009
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 107
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Abal, E., Moore, K., Gibbes, B. & Dennison, B. (Eds) (2002). State of South-east Queensland waterways report. Brisbane: Moreton Bay Waterways and Catchments Partnership.
- Abram, S. (2001). Anthropology versus science in Anthropology Today, Comment. Vol 17. No 4. pp 25.
- Adler, N., Shani, A. & Styhre, A. (Eds) (2004). Collaborative research in organisations. London, Thousand Oaks California: Sage Publications.
- Grigg, L. (1999). Cross disciplinary research: a discussion paper. Canberra: Australian Research Council.
- Lake Baroon Catchment Care Group (1995). People power in catchment care. Conference Proceedings, Maleny.
- Lawrence, G. (2003). Sustainable regional development: Recovering lost ground. In B. Pritchard, A. Curtis, J. Spriggs & R. Le Heron (Eds.), Social dimensions of the triple bottom line in rural Australia (pp. 157–170). Canberra: Bureau of Rural Sciences.
- Martin, P. (1991). Environmental care in agricultural catchments: Towards a communicative catchment. Environmental Management, 15(6): 773–778.
- Pearson, N. & Sanders, W. (1995). Indigenous peoples and reshaping Australian institutions: Two perspectives, Discussion paper, No. 102/1995. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research.
- Sinnamon, V. (1992). Gulf of Carpentaria coast and river management: An aboriginal management agency perspective. Paper presented to the Queensland Environmental Law Association Annual Conference. May 1992.
- Strang, V. (2005c). Meaningful differences: Dis-integrated management in the Mitchell River catchment. In M. Minnegal (Ed.) Sustainable communities, sustainable environments (pp. 60–69). Conference Proceedings, Melbourne: SAGES.
- Syme, G. J. (1992). When and where does participation count? In M. Munro-Clark (Ed.) Citizen participation in government. Sydney: Hale and Iremonger.
- Verdec, N. (1998). Improving public participation in caring for urban catchments. Masters Thesis, Griffith University.
- White, D., & O’Brian, K. (1999). The collaborative decision making ‘Tool Kit’: handbook for planning effective meetings. Blacktown NSW: K.D. Publications.
Metadata
- Authors
- Strang, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Strang, Veronica
- ORCID
- Strang, Veronica
- Venue
- Environment Development and Sustainability
- Published
- 2007-06-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 1387-585X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2975
- OpenAlex
- W1963650609
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Environment Development and Sustainability (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies
- Keywords
- interdisciplinary integration, natural and social sciences, environmental research, environmental management, interdisciplinary collaboration, research design, nature-culture dualism, data management, disciplinary identity, Australia, researcher reflexivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
