Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 30Heavy Metal Pollution RemediationHeavy metals in environmentAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Decontamination of water polluted by heavy metals with Taro (Colocasia esculenta) cultured in a hydroponic NFT system

Bindu, T., Sumi, M. M., Ramasamy, E. V.·2010·The Environmentalist

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10669-009-9240-6

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Abbasi SA, Ramasamy EV (1999) Biotechnological methods of pollution control. Orient Longman (Universities Press India Ltd), Hyderabad, p 168
  2. Aksorn E, Visoottiviseth P (2004) Selection of suitable emergent plants for removal of arsenic from arsenic contaminated water. Sci Asia 30:105–113 · DOI
  3. Banerjee G, Sarker S (1997) The role of Salvinia rotunadifolia in scavenging aquatic Pb II pollution. Bioproc Biosys Eng 17:295–300
  4. Bindu T, Ramasamy EV (2005) High solids anaerobic digestion for the recovery of energy and manure from Taro (Colocasia esculenta). J Solid Waste Technol Manag 31(2):69–77
  5. Bindu T, Ramasamy EV (2007) Utilisation of the pernicious weed Taro (Colocasia esculenta) in wastewater treatment and as a source of methane and manure. In: Santra SC (ed) New frontiers of environmental biotechnological application. ENVIS Centre on Environmental Biotechnology, University of Kalyani, Nadia, pp 171–177
  6. Chung IH, Jeng SS (1974) Heavy metal pollution of Ta-Tu River-Bull Inst Zool. Acad Sin 13:69–73
  7. Gupta M, Devi S (1995) Uptake and toxicity of Cadmium in aquatic ferns. J Environ Biol 16(2):131–136
  8. Kadlec R, Knight RL (1996) Treatment wetlands. Lewis, Boca Raton
  9. Snedecor GW, Cochran WC (1980) Statistical methods, 7th edn. The Iowa State University Press, Ames IA, p 505
  10. Tokunaga T, Furuta N, Morimoto M (1976) Accumulation of cadmium in Eichhornia crassipes. J Hyg Chem 22:234–239
  11. Wang W, Zhen W, Lin P (1997) Content and dynamics of five heavy metal elements in the leaves of five mangrove species in Jiulong Estuary. Oceanogr Taiwan Strait 16(2):233–238 (in Chinese with English abstract)

Cited by

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Bindu, T., Sumi, M. M., & Ramasamy, E. V.
Affiliations
Mahatma Gandhi University (IN)
Corresponding author
Ramasamy, E. V.
Venue
The Environmentalist
Published
2009-08-14
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
35-44
ISSN
  • 0251-1088 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2991
OpenAlex
W2124927310
Cited by
30
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Environment Systems & Decisions (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Mahatma Gandhi University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Keywords
taro, phytoremediation, heavy metal contamination, lead, cadmium, water remediation, metal bioaccumulation, root-to-shoot translocation, chlorosis, chlorophyll content, wastewater treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.