CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 131Ethics and Social Impacts of AIBioethics and Human Rights IssuesPhilosophical Ethics and Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Introducing the pervert’s dilemma: a contribution to the critique of Deepfake Pornography

Open access
Öhman, Carl·2020·Ethics and Information Technology
DOI 10.1007/s10676-019-09522-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Recent technological innovation has made video doctoring increasingly accessible. This has given rise to Deepfake Pornography, an emerging phenomenon in which Deep Learning algorithms are used to superimpose a person’s face onto a pornographic video. Although to most people, Deepfake Pornography is intuitively unethical, it seems difficult to justify this intuition without simultaneously condemning other actions that we do not ordinarily find morally objectionable, such as sexual fantasies. In the present article, I refer to this contradiction as the pervert’s dilemma. I propose that the method of Levels of Abstraction, a philosophical mode of enquiry inspired by Formal Methods in computer science, can be employed to formulate at least one possible solution to the dilemma. From this perspective, the permissibility of some actions appears to depend on the degree to which they are abstracted from their natural context. I conclude that the dilemma can only be solved when considered at low levels of abstractions, when Deepfakes are situated in the macro-context of gender inequality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10676-019-09522-1

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Öhman, C.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Öhman, Carl
ORCID
Öhman, Carl
Venue
Ethics and Information Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-11-19
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
133-140
ISSN
  • 1388-1957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8439
DOI
10.1007/s10676-019-09522-1
OpenAlex
W2989861661
Cited by
130
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Ethics and Information Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Keywords
deepfake pornography, deep learning, sexual fantasies, levels of abstraction, formal methods, gender inequality, ethics of pornography, moral intuitions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review