Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

D. Christopher Ralston; Justin Ho (Eds.): Philosophical Reflections on Disability: Series: Philosophy and Medicine, Vol. 104, Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, 263 pp., ISBN 978-90-481-2476-3, € 106.95

Open access
Felder, Franziska·2011·Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10677-010-9237-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Felder, F.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Felder, Franziska
Venue
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
Published
2010-07-15
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
247-249
ISSN
  • 1386-2820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8447
OpenAlex
W2096750628
Cited by
0
References
2
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
Licence
  • other-oa
  • www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
disability, philosophy of disability, conceptualization of disability, quality of life, social justice, medical ethics, bioethics, personal experience of disability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: D. Christopher Ralston; Justin Ho (Eds.): Philosophical Reflections on Disability: Series: Philosophy and Medicine, Vol. 104, Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, 263 pp., ISBN 978-90-481-2476-3, € 106.95. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10677-010-9237-8
The paper
Felder, F. (2011). D. Christopher Ralston; Justin Ho (Eds.): Philosophical Reflections on Disability: Series: Philosophy and Medicine, Vol. 104, Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, 263 pp., ISBN 978-90-481-2476-3, € 106.95. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-010-9237-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.