Analysis of Genetic Variability in Various Tissue Culture-Derived Lemon Plant Populations Using RAPD and Flow Cytometry
Abstract
Five populations of lemon plants [Citrus limon (L.) Burm] obtained from undeveloped ovules through different tissue culture procedures were examined for the presence of somaclonal and irradiation-induced genetic variation. Tested groups were: (1) nucellar seedlings; (2) organogenic, regenerated via adventitious buds from nucellar seedling internodes; (3) embryogenic population, regenerated from non-irradiated nucellar callus via somatic embryogenesis; (4) embryogenic population, regenerated from irradiated nucellar callus via somatic embryogenesis; and (5) protoplast-derived, regenerated via somatic embryogenesis. Genomic DNA samples from 360 plants (72 from each group) were screened for polymorphism among RAPD fingerprints amplified by 10 decamer primers. Among all tested plants, genetic variation was detected only within the group of plants recovered from irradiated embryogenic calli. Out of 72 plants from that group, three had RAPD fingerprints different from the rest of the population, and fourth plant was found to be cytochimeric, consisting of diploid and tetraploid cells as revealed by flow cytometry. In all other populations of regenerated plants, we did not come across any plants with changed ploidy level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RAPD is a more straightforward and affordable method that uses random primers to amplify DNA, quickly identifying somaclonal variation.
“RAPD is a more straightforward and affordable method that uses random primers to amplify DNA, quickly identifying somaclonal variation [120].”
From Somaclonal Variation and Clonal Fidelity in Commercial Micropropagation: Challenges and Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [120]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 21 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Orbović, V., Ćalović, M., Viloria, Z., Nielsen, B., Gmitter, F. G., Castle, W. S., & Grosser, J. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Venue
- Euphytica
- Published
- 2007-09-08
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 329-335
- ISSN
- 0014-2336 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5060
- OpenAlex
- W1974434660
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Euphytica (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- lemon, somaclonal variation, genetic variation, nucellar seedlings, somatic embryogenesis, embryogenic callus, protoplast culture, adventitious buds, ploidy level, RAPD polymorphism, flow cytometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review