The Evolution of Reversed Sexual Size Dimorphism in Hawks, Falcons and Owls: A Comparative Study
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Krüger's (2005) comparative study of 510 species of diurnal raptors and owls found strong support for male reduction and little support for female enlargement.
“These results agree with Krüger's (2005) who found strong support for male reduction and little support for female enlargement in a comparative study comprising 510 species of diurnal raptors and owls.”
From Structural complexity of hunting habitat and territoriality increase the reversed sexual size dimorphism in diurnal raptors (2018) · cites this paper as Krüger's (2005)
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793 · see citing works
Sexual Size Dimorphism in Hawks and Owls of North America
Snyder, N. F. R., & Wiley, J. W. (1976) · Ornithological Monographs · doi:10.2307/40166710 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Sexual Dimorphism in Accipiter Hawks: A New Hypothesis
Reynolds, R. T. (1972) · The Condor · doi:10.2307/1366283 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pérez‐Camacho, L., Martínez‐Hesterkamp, S., Rebollo, S., García‐Salgado, G., & Morales‐Castilla, I. (2018) · Journal of Avian Biology · doi:10.1111/jav.01745 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Harrington, K. J., Fahlbusch, J. A., Langrock, R., Therrien, J.-F., Houtz, J. L., & McDonald, B. I. (2020) · Animal Biotelemetry · doi:10.1186/s40317-020-00214-y · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Krüger, O.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Krüger, Oliver
- Venue
- Evolutionary Ecology
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 467-486
- ISSN
- 0269-7653 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-8477
- OpenAlex
- W2132217914
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Evolutionary Ecology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Royal Society
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Keywords
- reversed sexual size dimorphism, raptors, hawks, falcons, owls, prey size, feeding ecology, phylogenetically independent contrasts, natural selection, sexual selection, hunting strategies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
