Cited by 347Relativity and Gravitational TheoryQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

On the Gravitization of Quantum Mechanics 1: Quantum State Reduction

Open access
Penrose, Roger·2014·Foundations of Physics

Abstract

This paper argues that the case for “gravitizing” quantum theory is at least as strong as that for quantizing gravity. Accordingly, the principles of general relativity must influence, and actually change , the very formalism of quantum mechanics. Most particularly, an “Einsteinian”, rather than a “Newtonian” treatment of the gravitational field should be adopted, in a quantum system, in order that the principle of equivalence be fully respected. This leads to an expectation that quantum superpositions of states involving a significant mass displacement should have a finite lifetime, in accordance with a proposal previously put forward by Diósi and the author.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10701-013-9770-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Penrose postulates that quantum information is routinely lost in the quantum measurement process.

    “To complete the picture it should be mentioned that Penrose postulates that (quantum) information is actually routinely lost in the quantum measurement process.”
  • The scenario leads to empirical predictions qualitatively equivalent to those involving objective information loss.

    “Interestingly, such a scenario leads to empirical predictions, which are qualitatively equivalent to the ones involving objective information loss [49,50].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Penrose, R.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Penrose, Roger
Venue
Foundations of Physics
Published
2014-01-11
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
557-575
ISSN
  • 0015-9018 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9516
OpenAlex
W2093214980
Cited by
347
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Foundations of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
quantum state reduction, Diósi-Penrose model, quantum superposition, equivalence principle, quantum gravity, quantum mechanics and general relativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review