Cited by 59Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsEnvironmental and biological studies

Decomposition of Bt and Non-Bt Corn Hybrid Residues in the Field

Tarkalson, David D., Kachman, Stephen D., Knops, Johannes M. N., Thies, Janice E., Wortmann, Charles S.·2008·Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

Abstract

Results of a previous laboratory study indicated that six transgenic crops expressing the Cry1Ab insecticidal protein from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) decomposed at a slower rate than their respective non-Bt isolines. Consequently, litter decomposition rates, nitrogen cycling, and carbon pools may change in agricultural systems as the result of the widespread use of Bt crops. In this study, we assessed the decomposition rates and chemical composition of commonly grown hybrids of Bt and non-Bt isolines of corn (Zea mays L.) in the field. Leaves, stalks, and cobs from two Bt corn hybrids (Pioneer 34N44 Bt and NC+ 4990 Bt) and their non-Bt isolines (Pioneer 34N43 and NC+ 4880) were analyzed for biomass fractions (soluble, hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin) and total C and N content. Litterbags containing these residues were buried at a depth of 10 cm in a Holdrege silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Argiustolls) soil and recovered 5, 11, 17, and 23 months after placement in the field. There were no differences in the rates of decomposition and mass of C remaining over time between the Bt and non-Bt corn residues. Plant parts differed in decomposition rates where leaves > stalks > cobs. There were differences in total C, total N, biomass fractions, and C:N ratios between initial Bt and non-Bt corn residues, and between companies (NC+ and Pioneer), however, these differences did not result in differences in their rates of decomposition or mass of C remaining over time. For each plant part, there were no differences in lignin content between the Bt and non-Bt residues. These data suggest that the Bt and non-Bt corn hybrids used in this study should not cause differences in carbon sequestration when their residues decompose under similar environmental conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10705-007-9135-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The disagreement between stalk mass loss and total biomass loss might be due to differences between GE and their isolines in the proportion and composition of the plant organs in the residue, i.e. stalks and leaves which have a distinct rate of degradation.

    “This disagreement might be due to differences between GE and their isolines in the proportion and composition of the plant organs in the residue, i.e. stalks and leaves which have a distinct rate of degradation50,51.”

    From Impact of genetically engineered maize on agronomic, environmental and toxicological traits: a meta-analysis of 21 years of field data (2018) · cites this paper as [50]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 59

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rissler J, Mellon M (1996) The ecological risk of engineered crops. MIT, Cambridge, MA

Authors
Tarkalson, D. D., Kachman, S. D., Knops, J. M. N., Thies, J. E., & Wortmann, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Tarkalson, David D.
Venue
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
Published
2007-09-11
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
211-222
ISSN
  • 1385-1314 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0867
OpenAlex
W2156501074
Cited by
59
References
27
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and biological studies
Keywords
Bt maize, genetically modified crops, litter decomposition, corn residue, lignin, hemicellulose, cellulose, C/N ratio, carbon sequestration, nitrogen cycling, plant parts, field decomposition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review