Cited by 48Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsNitrogen and Sulfur Effects on BrassicaSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Evaluation of different agronomic strategies to reduce nitrate leaching after winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) using a simulation model.

Henke, J., Böttcher, U., Neukam, D., Sieling, K., Kage, H.·2008·Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

Abstract

Winter oilseed rape (OSR) demands high levels of N fertilizer, often exceeding 200 kg N ha⁻¹. Large amounts of residual soil mineral nitrogen (SMN) after harvest are regularly observed, and therefore N leaching during the percolation period over winter is increased. In this study agronomic strategies (fertilization level, crop rotation, tillage intensity) to control nitrate leaching after OSR were investigated by combining field measurements (soil mineral nitrogen, soil water content, crop N uptake) of a 2-year trial and another 5-year field trial with simulation modeling. The crop-soil model uses a daily time step and was built from existing and partly refined submodels for soil water dynamics, mineralization processes, and N uptake. It was used to reproduce the complex processes of the N dynamics and to calculate N concentration in the leachate and total volume of percolation water. Some parameters values were thereby newly identified based on the agreement between measured data and model results. Although SMN in the 60-90 cm layer was overestimated, the model could reproduce the measured data with an acceptable degree of accuracy. Overfertilization of OSR increased N leaching and therefore the precise calculation of N fertilizer doses is a first step towards prevent N leaching. Compared to ploughing, minimum tillage decreased N leaching when winter wheat was grown as the subsequent crop. Volunteer OSR and Phacelia tanacetifolia were grown as catch crops after OSR harvest. N leaching could be decreased especially when Phacelia was grown, but nitrate concentrations in the drainage water were higher and exceeded the European Union (EU) threshold for drinking water when volunteer OSR was grown. The results of this study provide strong evidence that reduced tillage or growing of noncruciferous catch crops decrease N leaching and may be used as an agricultural measure to prevent N pollution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10705-008-9192-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 48

Authors
Henke, J., Böttcher, U., Neukam, D., Sieling, K., & Kage, H.
Affiliations
  • Syngenta (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Corresponding author
Kage, H.
Venue
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
Published
2008-08-20
Volume
82
Issue
3
Pages
299-314
ISSN
  • 1385-1314 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0867
OpenAlex
W1989271131
Cited by
48
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
nitrate leaching, winter oilseed rape, Brassica napus, soil mineral nitrogen, crop rotation, tillage intensity, reduced tillage, catch crops, Phacelia tanacetifolia, volunteer crops, nitrogen fertilization, winter wheat, drainage water, nitrate contamination, nitrogen dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review