Cited by 6Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsPasture and Agricultural SystemsSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Marginal increase in nitrate leaching under grass–clover leys by slurry and mineral fertilizer

Open access
Fontaine, Doline, Rasmussen, Jim, Eriksen, Jørgen·2024·Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

Abstract

On dairy farms, fertilization of grass-clover swards ensures stable grass yields but may increase the potential for nitrate leaching on light-textured soils. The aim of this study was to quantify the N use efficiency and nitrate leaching under fertilized grass-clover leys. The study was conducted over 2 years at two sites, with increasing applications of mineral fertilizer (0–480 kg available N ha−1) alone or in combination with a basic application of cattle slurry. For plots fertilized with mineral N, the N soil surface balance was independent of the application rate and in the same range as for unfertilized plots (− 11 to 51 kg N ha−1). However, when plots were fertilized with slurry N (+ mineral N), the surplus was substantially increased owing to the fraction of organic N applied in slurry (95–100 kg N ha−1) and higher biological N 2 fixation inputs (55–228 kg N ha−1). The type of fertilizer had no effect on nitrate leaching across the full range of application rates. Nitrate leaching increased quadratically as a function of application rate, with a range of 3–117 kg N ha−1 (0.33–17 mg l−1 in soil solution sampled with suction cups) in the first year and less in the second year, when clover proportion was lower due to the self-regulatory nature of grass-clover mixtures. Importantly, the rate of marginal leaching increased with fertilization level: below 150 kg N ha−1 there was no additional leaching from fertilization and at 200 kg N ha−1 around 5% of additional fertilizer-N was leached. This is less than generally found for arable crops and thus even in intensive dairy systems, grass-clover leys are an environmentally favorable crop.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10705-023-10327-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • N surpluses varied widely between treatments after the grassland phase.

    “Since N surpluses varied widely between treatments after the grassland phase (Fontaine et al. 2024), some differences in the legacy effect of grass-clover swards were expected in the follow-on crop.”
  • Treatments with combinations of organic and mineral N had considerable N surpluses, up to 167 and 320 kg N ha-1 in 1st year grass-clover at SW and MW, and up to 102 and 205 kg N ha-1 in 2nd year grass-clover.

    “In particular, the treatments with combinations of organic and mineral N had considerable N surpluses (Fontaine et al. 2024), with up to 167 kg N ha -1 and 320 kg N ha -1 in 1 st year grass-clover at SW and MW, respectively, and up to 102 and 205 kg N ha -1 in 2nd year grassclover.”
  • On average across the two years of grass-clover in 2018-19 and the two annual follow-on crops in 2020-21, only the SW site showed significant grassland fertilizer treatment effects on nitrate leaching (P = 0.0002).

    “On average across the two years of grass-clover in 2018-19 (reported in Fontaine et al. 2024) and the two annual follow-on crops 2020-21 (Fig. 3), only the SW site showed significant grassland fertilizer treatment effects on nitrate leaching (P = 0.0002).”
  • It is possible to reduce nitrate leaching even at moderately high fertilization levels of mineral N and combinations of mineral and organic N, according to this study and Fontaine et al. (2024), and thus not expected to affect grass-clover yields.

    “This is possible even at moderately high fertilization levels of mineral N and combinations of mineral and organic N, according to this study and Fontaine et al. (2024) and thus not expected to affect grass-clover yields.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fontaine, D., Rasmussen, J., & Eriksen, J.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Eriksen, Jørgen
Venue
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
Published
2023-11-16
Volume
128
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 1385-1314 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0867
OpenAlex
W4388733178
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Innovationsfonden (6159-00001B)
  • Grønt Udviklings- og Demonstrations Program (34009-19-1600)
  • Royal Danish Library, Aarhus University Library
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
nitrate leaching, grass-clover ley, cattle slurry, mineral fertilizers, nitrogen use efficiency, nitrogen fixation, light soils, dairy farming, soil solution nitrate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review