The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimating Land Surface Evaporation: A Review of Methods Using Remotely Sensed Surface Temperature Data
Open accessAbstract
This paper reviews methods for estimating evaporation from landscapes, regions and larger geographic extents, with remotely sensed surface temperatures, and highlights uncertainties and limitations associated with those estimation methods. Particular attention is given to the validation of such approaches against ground based flux measurements. An assessment of some 30 published validations shows an average root mean squared error value of about 50 W m−2 and relative errors of 15–30%. The comparison also shows that more complex physical and analytical methods are not necessarily more accurate than empirical and statistical approaches. While some of the methods were developed for specific land covers (e.g. irrigation areas only) we also review methods developed for other disciplines, such as hydrology and meteorology, where continuous estimates in space and in time are needed, thereby focusing on physical and analytical methods as empirical methods are usually limited by in situ training data. This review also provides a discussion of temporal and spatial scaling issues associated with the use of thermal remote sensing for estimating evaporation. Improved temporal scaling procedures are required to extrapolate instantaneous estimates to daily and longer time periods and gap-filling procedures are needed when temporal scaling is affected by intermittent satellite coverage. It is also noted that analysis of multi-resolution data from different satellite/sensor systems (i.e. data fusion) will assist in the development of spatial scaling and aggregation approaches, and that several biological processes need to be better characterized in many current land surface models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Miralles, D. G., Gentine, P., Seneviratne, S. I., & Teuling, A. J. (2019) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13912 · Cited by 1,080
Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) in vegetation: 50 years of progress
Mohammed, G. H., Colombo, R., Middleton, E. M., Rascher, U., van der Tol, C., Nedbal, L., Goulas, Y., Pérez-Priego, O., Damm, A., Meroni, M., et al. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.030 · Cited by 747
Use of Landsat thermal imagery in monitoring evapotranspiration and managing water resources
Anderson, M. C., Allen, R. G., Morse, A., & Kustas, W. P. (2012) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.025 · Cited by 734
Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., Pan, M., Beck, H., Coccia, G., Serrat‐Capdevila, A., & Verbist, K. (2018) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2017wr022437 · Cited by 561
Zhan, W., Chen, Y., Zhou, J., Wang, J., Liu, W., Voogt, J., Zhu, X., Quan, J., & Li, J. (2013) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.12.014 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalma, J. D., McVicar, T. R., & McCabe, M. F.
- Venue
- Surveys in Geophysics
- Published
- 2008-08-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 421-469
- ISSN
- 0046-5763 (ISSN-L)
- 0169-3298
- 1573-0956
- OpenAlex
- W2016044589
- Cited by
- 1,180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating Land Surface Evaporation: A Review of Methods Using Remotely Sensed Surface Temperature Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10712-008-9037-z
- The paper
- Kalma, J. D., McVicar, T. R., & McCabe, M. F. (2008). Estimating Land Surface Evaporation: A Review of Methods Using Remotely Sensed Surface Temperature Data. Surveys in Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-008-9037-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.