Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 20Relativity and Gravitational TheoryCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 30 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Massive Nordström scalar (density) gravities from universal coupling

Open access
Pitts, J. Brian·2011·General Relativity and Gravitation

Abstract

Both particle physics and the 1890s Seeliger–Neumann modification of Newtonian gravity suggest considering a “mass term” for gravity, yielding a finite range due to an exponentially decaying Yukawa potential. Unlike Nordström’s “massless” theory, massive scalar gravities are strictly Special Relativistic, being invariant under the Poincaré group but not the conformal group. Geometry is a poor guide to understanding massive scalar gravities: matter sees a conformally flat metric, but gravity also sees the rest of the flat metric, barely, in the mass term. Infinitely many theories exhibit this bimetric ‘geometry,’ all with the total stress–energy’s trace as source. All are new except the Freund–Nambu theory. The smooth massless limit indicates underdetermination of theories by data between massless and massive scalar gravities. The ease of accommodating electrons, protons and other fermions using density-weighted Ogievetsky–Polubarinov spinors in scalar gravity is noted.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

The paper derives uncountably infinitely many massive scalar gravities by universal coupling to the trace of the total stress-energy tensor, generalizing Nordström’s massless scalar gravity. All are new except the Freund-Nambu theory, and the massive variants are strictly special relativistic, invariant only under the 10-parameter Poincaré group rather than the 15-parameter conformal group.

Key findings

  • Universal coupling yields a distinct massive scalar gravity for every real density weight \(w\); the case \(w=1/2\) is the previously known Freund-Nambu theory, while all other cases are new.
  • The mass term breaks conformal symmetry: massive variants are invariant only under the 10-parameter Poincaré group, whereas Nordström’s massless theory is invariant under the 15-parameter conformal group.
  • The theories have a smooth massless limit, producing underdetermination between massless and sufficiently small-mass massive scalar gravities.
  • Stability analysis finds the only critical point is the expected vacuum \(\sqrt{-g}=\sqrt{-\eta}\) (giving \(\gamma=0\) for all \(w\)), and it is the ground state for all \(w\); some theories repel infinitely from the singularity \(\sqrt{-g}=0\), while others do not.

Methods

  • Theoretical derivation using Lagrangian densities, scalar density variables, and the Rosenfeld-type metrical definition of stress-energy; universal coupling adds the trace of the total stress-energy tensor as source.
  • A bimetric change of variables \(g=\eta+k\gamma\) is used, with \(k^2=64\pi G w^2\) and \(k=8\sqrt{\pi G}w\); special cases \(w=1\) and \(w=0\) are handled separately, including by l’Hôpital’s rule.
  • No empirical data or sample is analyzed; the work is a formal field-theoretic construction, including spinor coupling via density-weighted Ogievetsky-Polubarinov spinors of weight \(3/8\) in four spacetime dimensions.

Limitations

  • The paper states that no claim of exhaustiveness is made: “There might be still other massive scalar gravities worthy of discovery.”
  • It states that checking stability for all \(w\) perturbatively would be substantial and that treating all infinitely many theories perturbatively is not viable; using the neutral \(w=0\) field gives infinite series with no polynomial case, making analysis difficult.
  • Evident from the text: the paper performs no observational fitting or empirical test of the theories, so the claimed empirical viability of sufficiently small masses is not demonstrated here.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10714-010-1100-7

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 8 Not valid · 21 Not checked · 94 Own results and interpretations

67 more claims

Create a free account to see all 123 claims and to verify the 21 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 29
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 22
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 6

Create a free account to see these claims.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Renn, J., Schemmel, M. (eds): The Genesis of General Relativity, Volume 3: Gravitation in the Twilight of Classical Physics: Between Mechanics, Field Theory, and Astronomy. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  2. von Laue M.: Die Nordströmsche Gravitationstheorie. Journal der Radioaktivität und Electronik 14, 263 (1917)
  3. Pauli W., Fierz M.: Über relativistische Feldgleichungen von Teilchen mit beliebigem Spin im elektromagnetischen Feld. Helv. Phys. Acta 12, 297 (1939)
  4. Tonnelat M.-A.: La particule de spin 2 et la loi de gravitation d’Einstein dans le cas de présence de matière. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l’Académie des sciences 218, 305 (1944)
  5. von Seeliger H.: Ueber das Newton’sche Gravitationgesetz. Sitzungsberichte der mathematisch-physikalischen Classe der k. b. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München 26, 373 (1896)
  6. North, J.D.: The Measure of the Universe: A History of Modern Cosmology. Oxford University, 1990. Dover reprint (1965)
  7. DeWitt B.S.: Dynamical Theory of Groups and Fields. Gordon and Breach, New York (1965)
  8. Trautman, A.: Foundations and current problems of General Relativity. In: Deser, S., Ford, K.W. (eds.) Lectures on General Relativity, pp. 1–248. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1965). Brandeis Summer Institute in Theoretical Physics
  9. Kraichnan, R.H.: Special-relativistic derivation of generally covariant gravitation theory. Phys. Rev. 98, 1118 (1955). Errata 99, 1906 (1955)
  10. Anderson J.L.: Principles of Relativity Physics. Academic, New York (1967)
  11. Einstein, A., Grossmann, M.: Outline of a generalized theory of relativity and of a theory of gravitation. In: Beck, A., Howard, D. (eds.) The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 4, The Swiss Years: Writings, 1912–1914, English Translation. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Princeton University, Princeton, 1996. Translated from Entwurf einer verallgemeinerten Relativitätstheorie und einer Theorie der Gravitation, Teubner, Leipzig (1913)
  12. Ogievetskii V.I., Polubarinov I.V.: Theory of a neutral massive tensor field with spin 2. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 11, 135 (1966)
  13. Misner C., Thorne K., Wheeler J.A.: Gravitation. Freeman, New York (1973)
  14. Gołab, S.: Tensor Calculus. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1974). Trans.: Eugene Lepa
  15. Rosenfeld, L.: Sur le tenseur d’impulsion-énergie. Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, Classe des Sciences, 18(6), 1 (1940). English translation in Selected Papers of Léon Rosenfeld, p. 711, edited by Robert S. Cohen and John J. Stachel. D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1977)
  16. Gotay, M.J., Marsden, J.E.: Stress-energy-momentum tensors and the Belinfante-Rosenfeld formula. In: Gotay, M.J., Marsden, J.E., Moncrief, V. (eds.) Mathematical Aspects of Classical Field Theory (Seattle, 1991). Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 132, p. 367. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1992). http://www.math.hawaii.edu/~gotay/SEMTensors.pdf
  17. Israel W.: Differential Forms in General Relativity, 2nd edn. Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Dublin (1979)
  18. Szybiak A.: On the Lie derivative of geometric objects from the point of view of functional equations. Prace Matematyczne=Schedae Mathematicae 11, 85 (1966)
  19. Choquet-Bruhat Y., DeWitt-Morette C.: Analysis, Manifolds, and Physics. Part II: 92 Applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1989)
  20. Ogievetskiĭ V.I., Polubarinov I.V.: Spinors in gravitation theory. Sov. Phys. JETP 21, 1093 (1965)
  21. Bilyalov R.F.: Spinors on Riemannian manifolds. Russ. Math. (Iz. VUZ) 46(11), 6 (2002)
  22. Branson, T.: Conformal structure and spin geometry. In: Bourguignon, J.-P., Branson, T., Chamseddine, A., Hijazi, O., Stanton, R.J. (eds.) Dirac Operators: Yesterday and Today: Proceedings of the Summer School and Workshop, CAMS-AUB, Lebanon, August 27–September 7, 2001. International Press, Somerville (2005)
  23. Pitts, J.B.: General covariance, artificial gauge freedom and empirical equivalence. PhD thesis, Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame (2008). Supervised by Don Howard
  24. Jeffrey A.: Handbook of Mathematical Formulas and Integrals. Academic, San Diego (1995)
  25. Shenk A.: Calculus and Analytic Geometry, 4th edn. Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview (1988)

Cited by

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Pitts, J. B.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Pitts, J. Brian
Venue
General Relativity and Gravitation
Published
2010-10-29
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
871-895
ISSN
  • 0001-7701 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9532
OpenAlex
W2167385048
Cited by
20
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • General Relativity and Gravitation (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
Nordström theory, universal coupling, Yukawa potential, conformally flat metrics, Poincaré invariance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.