CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 68Genetic diversity and population structureGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetics and Plant Breeding

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Genetic Diversity of Tunisian Olive Tree (Olea europaea L.) Cultivars Assessed by AFLP Markers

Grati-Kamoun, N., Mahmoud, F. Lamy, Rebaï, A., Gargouri, A., Panaud, O., Saar, A.·2006·Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
DOI 10.1007/s10722-004-6130-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

About 29 olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars including oil and table olive cultivars originating from Tunisia and other Mediterranean countries, were genotyped using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) DNA markers. This technique is a rapid and efficient method for producing DNA fingerprints. Using nine AFLP primer combinations, we produced a total of 410 AFLP markers, among which 172 revealed polymorphism. The results demonstrated a high degree of polymorphism in the olive germplasm we examined with an average of 39%. These AFLP markers were analyzed to estimate genetic distances between pairs of cultivars using Jaccard's similarity coefficient. Furthermore, cluster and principal component analyses were performed in order to identify the genetic variation patterns. Two main groups were obtained: one comprising primarily small-fruited cultivars grown mainly for oil production and the other comprising large fruited cultivars (regardless of their end-use). Our results show no evidence of clustering of olive cultivars according to their geographic origin.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10722-004-6130-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. A. Angiolillo, 1999, Theor. Appl. Genet., 98, 411, 10.1007/s001220051087 · DOI
  2. P.F. Bert, 1999, Theor. Appl. Genet., 99, 445, 10.1007/s001220051256 · DOI
  3. A. Belaj, 2002, Theor. Appl. Genet., 105, 638, 10.1007/s00122-002-0981-6 · DOI
  4. G. Bianchi, 2001, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol., 103, 141, 10.1002/1438-9312(200103)103:3<141::AID-EJLT141>3.0.CO;2-X · DOI
  5. P. Bogani, 1994, Acta Hort., 356, 98, 10.17660/ActaHortic.1994.356.21 · DOI
  6. V. Bronzini de Caraffa, 2002, Theor. Appl. Genet., 104, 1209, 10.1007/s00122-002-0883-7 · DOI
  7. J.M. Caballero, 1990, Acta Hort., 286, 45, 10.17660/ActaHortic.1990.286.4 · DOI
  8. E. Campeol, 2001, J. Agric. Food. Chem., 49, 5409, 10.1021/jf010455n · DOI
  9. F. Carriero, 2002, Theor. Appl. Genet., 104, 301, 10.1007/s001220100691 · DOI
  10. A. Chevalier, 1948, Rev. Int. Bot. Appl. Agric. Trop., 28, 1
  11. G. Cipriani, 2002, Theor. Appl. Genet., 104, 223, 10.1007/s001220100685 · DOI
  12. R. Cifferi, 1950, Acte du XIII congrès International d’oléïculture, 1, 189
  13. A. Cimato, 1996, Olivae, 62, 46
  14. A. Fabbri, 1995, J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 120, 538, 10.21273/JASHS.120.3.538 · DOI
  15. E. Finotti, 2001, Nahrung/Food, 45, 350, 10.1002/1521-3803(20011001)45:5<350::AID-FOOD350>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  16. G. Fontanazza, 1990, Olivae, 34, 32
  17. N. Grati Kamoun, 1999, Contribution à la caractérisation pomologique, chimique et enzymatique de quelques variétés d’oliviers en Tunisie
  18. Grati Kamoun N., Chibani F., Chaari A. and Khlif M. 1992. Etude Etude de la variabilité isoenzymatique chez l’olivier. Proceedings of the 32nd Science week Symposium, Damas, Syria. November 7–11, 1992, Book 3. Part 1, pp. 407–420.
  19. N. Grati Kamoun, 1999, Acta Hort., 474, 701, 10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.474.145 · DOI
  20. N. Grati Kamoun, 2000, Proceedings of the 4th International olive growing Symposium
  21. Grati Kamoun N. and Khlif M. 2001. Caractérisation technologique des variétés d’olivier cultivées en Tunisie. Ezzaitouna, special number, pp. 1–74.
  22. N. Grati Kamoun, 2002a, Acta Hort., 586, 137, 10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.586.21 · DOI
  23. N. Grati Kamoun, 2002b, Acta Hort., 586, 147, 10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.586.23 · DOI
  24. P. Hermandez, 2001, Theor. Appl. Genet., 103, 788, 10.1007/s001220100603 · DOI
  25. V. Hongtrakul, 1997, Theor. Appl. Genet., 95, 400, 10.1007/s001220050576 · DOI
  26. P. Jaccard, 1908, Bulletin de la Société Vaudense des Sciences Naturelles., 44, 223
  27. A. Koutsaftakis, 2000, Olivae, 81, 20
  28. M. Thierry D’ennequin Le, 2000, Theor. Appl. Genet., 100, 1061, 10.1007/s001220051387 · DOI
  29. M. Loukas, 1983, J. Hort.Sci., 58, 121, 10.1080/00221589.1983.11515099 · DOI
  30. R. Loussert, 1978, L’olivier, 47
  31. H. Mehri, 1997, Plant Genet. Resour. Newslett., 112, 68
  32. U.G. Mueller, 1999, Trend. Ecol. Evol., 14, 389, 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01659-6 · DOI
  33. N. Ouazzani, 1993, J. Hered., 84, 34, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111274 · DOI
  34. N. Ouazzani, 1995, Agronomie, 15, 31, 10.1051/agro:19950104 · DOI
  35. E. Perri, 1995, Italus Hortus., 1/2, 31
  36. C.A. Pontikis, 1980, J. Hort. Sci., 55, 333, 10.1080/00221589.1980.11514942 · DOI
  37. W. Powell, 1996, Mol. Breed., 2, 225, 10.1007/BF00564200 · DOI
  38. P. Rallo, 2000, Theor. Appl. Genet., 101, 984, 10.1007/s001220051571 · DOI
  39. F.J. Rohlf, 1999, NTSYS-PC numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.1
  40. J. Ruby, 1918, Recherches morphologiques et biologiques sur l’olivier et sur les variétés cultivées en France
  41. K.M. Sefc, 2000, Mol. Ecol., 9, 1171, 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00954.x · DOI
  42. I. Trujillo, 1995, J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 120/2, 318, 10.21273/JASHS.120.2.318 · DOI
  43. G. Vergari, 1996, Olivae, 60, 19
  44. G. Vergari, 1998, Olivae, 73, 31
  45. F. Visioli, 2002, Med. Res. Rev., 22, 65, 10.1002/med.1028 · DOI
  46. P. Vos, 1995, Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 4407, 10.1093/nar/23.21.4407 · DOI
  47. Z. Wiesman, 1998, J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 123, 837, 10.21273/JASHS.123.5.837 · DOI
  48. L. Zhang, 1999, Theor. Appl. Genet., 98, 895, 10.1007/s001220051148 · DOI
  49. H. Zohary, 1975, Science, 187, 319, 10.1126/science.187.4174.319 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Grati-Kamoun, N., Mahmoud, F. L., Rebaï, A., Gargouri, A., Panaud, O., & Saar, A.
Affiliations
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • Centre of Biotechnology of Sfax (TN)
Corresponding author
Rebaï, A.
ORCID
Venue
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2006-03
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
265-275
ISSN
  • 0925-9864 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5109
DOI
10.1007/s10722-004-6130-0
OpenAlex
W1986912749
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
Keywords
olive, Olea europaea, olive cultivars, genetic diversity, AFLP markers, olive germplasm, table olives, fruit size, genetic distance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review