The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Crop landraces inventory for Portugal
Abstract
The threats to agrobiodiversity ultimately affect our future food security. Countries bonded to national or international biodiversity conservation legislation should conserve and sustainably use their agrobiodiversity. Landraces are a key element of agrobiodiversity which is largely endangered due to lack of their systematic conservation, and partially due to obstacles in developing inventories which may be assigned to the difficulties in applying a standard landrace’ definition and to complications associated with nomenclature (synonyms/homonyms). Effective national conservation of landraces can be best achieved with a comprehensive inventory. In this paper, we developed a comprehensive inventory of food and other Portuguese agricultural landraces by surveying literature, local media, and farms. Farms were selected based on knowledge of experts and using an ecogeographic diversity approach based on Geographic Information Systems. We compiled 14,813 records of 7492 different landraces. Grape vine (Vitis vinifera L.), common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), and maize (Zea mays L. subsp. mays) have the highest number of landraces in Portugal according with the gathered data. Bragança and Faro are the districts with more records of landraces. The landrace inventory for Portugal that we developed is a first iteration of such kind and should be updated systematically.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 7
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Camacho-Villa T, Maxted N, Scholten M, Ford-Lloyd B (2005) Defining and identifying crop landraces. Plant Genet Resour 3(3):373–384. https://doi.org/10.1079/PGR200591 · DOI
- Cardoso S, Maxted N (2009) Regional and crop-specific survey: Grapevine landraces in Douro and Colares, Portugal. In: Veteläinen M, Negri V, Maxted N (eds) European landraces on–farm conservation, management and use. Biodiversity Technical Bulletin No. 15. Biodiversity International, Rome, Italy
- Maxted N, Guarino L, Myer L, Chiwona EA (2002) Towards a methodology for on-farm conservation of plant genetic resources. Genet Resour Crop Evol 49:31–46. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013896401710 · DOI
- Martins SR, Vences FJ, Sáenz de Mira LE, Barroso MR, Carnide V (2006) RAPD analysis of genetic diversity among and within Portuguese landraces of common white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Sci Hortic 108:133–142 · DOI
- Maxted N, Veteläinen M, Negri V (2009) Landraces inventories: Needs and methodologies. In: Veteläinen M, Negri V, Maxted N (eds) European landraces on–farm conservation, management and use. Biodiversity Technical Bulletin No. 15. Biodiversity International, Rome, Italy
- Mendes Moreira P, Pêgo S, Vaz Patto MC (2009) On-farm conservation in Portugal—Vaso project—A long-term conservation programme. In: Veteläinen M, Negri V, Maxted N (eds) European landraces on–farm conservation, management and use. Biodiversity Technical Bulletin No. 15. Biodiversity International, Rome, Italy
- Negri V (2005) Agro-biodiversity conservation in Europe: Ethical Issues. J Agric Environ Ethics 18:3–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-004-3084-3 · DOI
- Negri V, Torricelli R (2015) The Italian landrace conservation. Strategy Landrace 3:9–11
- Negri V, Maxted, N, Veteläinen M (2009) European landrace conservation: An introduction. In: Veteläinen M, Negri V, Maxted N (eds) European landraces on–farm conservation, management and use. Biodiversity Technical Bulletin No. 15. Biodiversity International, Rome, Italy
- Parra-Quijano M, Iriondo JM, Torres E (2012) Improving representativeness of genebank collections through species distribution models, gap analysis and ecogeographic maps. Biodivers Conserv 21:79–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0167-0 · DOI
- Raggi L, Pacicco LC, Caproni L, Álvarez-muñiz C, Annamaa K, Barata AM, Batir-rusu D, Díez MJ, Heinonen M, Holubec V, Kell S, Kutnjak H, Maierhofer H, Poulsen G, Prohens J, Ralli P, Rocha F, Rubio Teso ML, Sandru D, Santamaria P, Sensen S, Shoemark O, Soler S, Străjeru S, Thormann I, Weibull J, Maxted N, Negri V (2022) Landrace in situ conservation across Europe: lessons learnt through extensive data analysis. Biol Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109460 · DOI
- Veteläinen M, Negri V, Maxted N (2009) A European strategic approach to conserving crop landraces. In: Veteläinen M, Negri V, Maxted N (eds) European landraces on-farm conservation, management and use. Biodiversity Technical Bulletin No. 15. Biodiversity International, Rome, Italy
- Vincent H, Amri A, Castañeda-Álvarez NP, Dempewolf H, Dulloo ME, Guarino L, Hole D, Mba C, Toledo A, Maxted N (2019) Modelling of crop wild relative species identifies areas globally for in situ conservation. Commun Biol 2:136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0372-z · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Almeida, M. J., Pinheiro de Carvalho, M. Â. A., Barata, A. M., Magos Brehm, J., & Maxted, N.
- Venue
- Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
- Published
- 2022-11-17
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1151-1161
- ISSN
- 0925-9864
- 1573-5109
- Cited by
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crop landraces inventory for Portugal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10722-022-01492-6
- The paper
- Almeida, M. J., Pinheiro de Carvalho, M. Â. A., Barata, A. M., Magos Brehm, J., & Maxted, N. (2023). Crop landraces inventory for Portugal. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-022-01492-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
