The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: a survey
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Framework for Operational Modelling of Hospital Resources
Harper, P. R. (2002) · Health Care Management Science · doi:10.1023/a:1019767900627 · Cited by 279 · cited 2×
“MORE 1 4 [122] 7 1–2–6–9–11–17 1–3 1D–1–2W 2 4 [123] 7–8 2 20 3 1D 2 4 [124] 2 7 6 1–2–3 1–2 W 1 Different scheduling policies have been presented by Harper [122] that developed a simulation model (PROMPT, Patient and Resource Operational Management Planning Tool) for hospital resource planning.”
Method
Cited by
Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: A review of optimization studies
Ahmadi-Javid, A., Jalali, Z., & Klassen, K. J. (2017) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.06.064 · Cited by 434
Analytics for Hospital Resource Planning—Two Case Studies
Xie, J., Zhuang, W., Ang, M., Chou, M. C., Luo, L., & Yao, D. D. (2021) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.13158 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Guerriero, F., & Guido, R.
- Venue
- Health Care Management Science
- Published
- 2010-11-20
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-114
- ISSN
- 1386-9620 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9389
- OpenAlex
- W2051164837
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 127.08
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: a survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10729-010-9143-6
- The paper
- Guerriero, F., & Guido, R. (2011). Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: a survey. Health Care Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-010-9143-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
