Cited by 97Healthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationScheduling and Timetabling SolutionsEmergency and Acute Care Studies

A stochastic optimization model for shift scheduling in emergency departments

Open access
EL-Rifai, Omar, Garaix, Thierry, Augusto, Vincent, Xie, Xiaolan·2015·Health Care Management Science

Abstract

Excessive waiting time in Emergency Departments (ED) can be both a cause of frustration and more importantly, a health concern for patients. Waiting time arises when the demand for work goes beyond the facility's service capacity. ED service capacity mainly depends on human resources and on beds available for patients. In this paper, we focus on human resources organization in an ED and seek to best balance between service quality and working conditions. More specifically, we address the personnel scheduling problem in order to optimize the shift distribution among employees and minimize the total expected patients' waiting time. The problem is also characterized by a multi-stage re-entrant service process. With an appropriate approximation of patients' waiting times, we first propose a stochastic mixed-integer programming model that is solved by a sample average approximation (SAA) approach. The resulting personnel schedules are then evaluated using a discrete-event simulation model. Numerical experiments are then performed with data from a French hospital to compare different personnel scheduling strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10729-014-9300-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The interdisciplinary team's emergency resource scheduling model demonstrated how synchronizing patient flow optimization with algorithmic rostering could overcome traditional management's "efficiency ceiling".

    “the interdisciplinary team’s emergency resource scheduling model demonstrated how synchronizing patient flow optimization with algorithmic rostering could overcome traditional management’s “efficiency ceiling“ [20].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
EL-Rifai, O., Garaix, T., Augusto, V., & Xie, X.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Xie, Xiaolan
Venue
Health Care Management Science
Published
2014-10-01
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
289-302
ISSN
  • 1386-9620 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9389
OpenAlex
W1998011595
Cited by
97
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Care Management Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-TECS-0010)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
emergency department, shift scheduling, workforce scheduling, patient waiting time, stochastic mixed-integer programming, sample average approximation, discrete event simulation, service capacity, hospital human resources
MeSH terms
Appointments and Schedules, Computer Simulation, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Personnel Administration, Hospital, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Personnel, Hospital, Stochastic Processes, Triage, Waiting Lists, Workload, Efficiency, Organizational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review