The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What actually works to enhance graduate employability? The relative value of curricular, co-curricular, and extra-curricular learning and paid work
Open accessAbstract
The focus on short-term graduate employment metrics has catalysed the employability agenda as a strategic directive in universities. A raft of embedded, co-curricular, and extra-curricular activities has emerged for developing employability. Their relative value lacks empirical exploration. This study explored graduates’ self-reported participation in, and their perspectives on the value of, a range of embedded, extra-curricular, and co-curricular learning activities, as well as paid work, for employability. Survey data were gathered (N = 510) from Business and Creative Industries graduates from three Australian universities about the perceived value of activities for skill development, gaining relevant experience, networking, and creating employment opportunities. The activities were considered more useful for gaining experience and skills than for broadening networks and improving career outcomes. Embedded and extra-curricular internships, as well as extra-curricular activities, were believed to be important for enhancing employability. Internships organised as an extra-curricular activity rated better than those delivered as work-integrated learning. Implications for stakeholders responsible for curricular and co-curricular design are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference
Mallery, P., & George, D. (1998) · Cited by 10,312
Harrell, F. E. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1 · Cited by 9,195
Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.16 · Cited by 5,512
Human Capital. A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education
Muhsam, H. V., & Becker, G. S. (1965) · Revue de l'Institut International de Statistique / Review of the International Statistical Institute · doi:10.2307/1401709 · Cited by 5,146
(1964) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 5,128
Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications
Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.005 · Cited by 2,168
Grewal, R., Cote, J. A., & Baumgartner, H. (2004) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0070 · Cited by 1,228
Rethinking graduate employability: the role of capital, individual attributes and context
Clarke, M. (2018) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1294152 · Cited by 882
Employability skill development in work-integrated learning: Barriers and best practice
Jackson, D. (2015) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.842221 · Cited by 762
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, D., & Bridgstock, R.
- Venue
- Higher Education
- Published
- 2020-06-11
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 723-739
- ISSN
- 0018-1560 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-174X
- OpenAlex
- W3034639600
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 47.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What actually works to enhance graduate employability? The relative value of curricular, co-curricular, and extra-curricular learning and paid work. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10734-020-00570-x
- The paper
- Jackson, D., & Bridgstock, R. (2021). What actually works to enhance graduate employability? The relative value of curricular, co-curricular, and extra-curricular learning and paid work. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00570-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.