Cited by 169Vagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Vagus nerve stimulation: From pre-clinical to clinical application: Challenges and future directions

De Ferrari, Gaetano M., Schwartz, Peter J.·2011·Heart Failure Reviews

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation was performed experimentally for the first time more than 150 years ago. In the 1980s and 1990s, vagus nerve stimulation was shown, both in the anesthetized and in the conscious animal, to exert marked antiarrhythmic effects, particularly during acute myocardial ischemia. There is a strong rationale for a beneficial effect of augmented vagal activity in the setting of chronic heart failure. Studies in experimental models of heart failure showed that chronic vagus nerve stimulation exerts beneficial effects on left ventricular function and on survival. Vagus nerve stimulation is approved in man for refractory epilepsy and depression. The first-in-man study performed in 32 patients with chronic heart failure suggests that vagus nerve stimulation was safe and well tolerated. Six months of open-label treatment was associated with significant improvements (P < 0.001) in NYHA class, quality of life, 6-min walk test, LV ejection fraction (from 22 ± 7 to 29 ± 8%), and LV systolic volumes (P = 0.02). These improvements were maintained at 1 year. Mechanisms of action may include the following: heart rate, anti-adrenergic, anti-apoptotic, and anti-inflammatory effects as well as an increase in nitric oxide. Controlled clinical trials will start soon to assess whether vagus nerve stimulation can indeed represent a new non-pharmacological approach for the treatment of symptomatic heart failure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10741-010-9216-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 169

Authors
De Ferrari, G. M., & Schwartz, P. J.
Affiliations
University of Cape Town (ZA)
Venue
Heart Failure Reviews
Published
2010-12-17
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
195-203
ISSN
  • 1382-4147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7322
OpenAlex
W2074217022
Cited by
169
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Heart Failure Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
vagus nerve stimulation, chronic heart failure, antiarrhythmic effect, myocardial ischemia, left ventricular function, NYHA functional class, quality of life, nitric oxide, anti-inflammatory activity, anti-apoptotic effects, non-pharmacological treatment, epilepsy, depression
MeSH terms
Animals, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Disease Models, Animal, Heart Failure, Humans, Stroke Volume, Systole, Time Factors, Vagus Nerve, Ventricular Function, Left, Vagus Nerve Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review