Effect of exercise on epicardial adipose tissue in adults: A systematic review and meta-analyses
Abstract
According to previous epidemiological studies, we can reduce the thickness of epicardial fat and improve cardiovascular risk factors through exercise, and the changes may depend on the form of exercise. We systemically reviewed published studies that evaluated exercise intervention on epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) levels. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing one exercise with another exercise or diet for the treatment to reduce EAT. We used fixed effects models for meta-analyses; effects of exercise on outcomes were described as mean differences (MD) or standardized difference of means (SMD) was used, their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Five RCTs were included (n = 299), 156 in exercise group and 143 in the control. In comparison to the control group, exercise significantly reduced EAT (SMD - 0.57, 95%CI - 0.97 to - 0.18) and waist circumference (MD - 2.95 cm, 95%CI - 4.93 to - 0.97). Exercise did not have an effect on BMI (MD - 0.23 kg/m 2, 95%CI - 0.73 to 0.27), weight (MD - 0.06 kg, 95%CI - 1.46 to 1.34), or HDL (SMD 0.26, 95%CI - 0.06 to 0.57).VO 2 was significantly increased by exercise (SMD 1.58, 95%CI 1.17 to 1.99). Risk of bias was high for 3 studies, and GRADE quality of evidence was very low to moderate. Exercise reduced epicardial adipose tissue and waist circumference, and did not have effect on weight, BMI, or HDL. Newer trials with better design and methods are necessary to improve the quality of the evidence. PROSPERO registration number (CRD42018096581).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Exercise has no effect on BMI, but may reduce EAT and waist circumference.
“A recent systematic review and meta-analysis reports that exercise has no effect on BMI, but may reduce EAT and waist circumference [136].”
From Dysregulated epicardial adipose tissue as a risk factor and potential therapeutic target of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in diabetes (2022) · cites this paper as [136]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 40
- Authors
- Colonetti, T., Grande, A. J., Amaral, M. C., Colonetti, L., Uggioni, M. L., da Rosa, M. I., Hernandez, A. V., Tse, G., Liu, T., Nerlekar, N., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Neto, M. G., Durães, A. R., Pontes-Neto, O., Resende, E. S., & Roever, L.
- Affiliations
- Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense (BR)
- Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR)
- Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University (CN)
- Monash Health (AU)
- Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR)
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Roever, Leonardo
- ORCID
- Venue
- Heart Failure Reviews
- Published
- 2020-05-16
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1399-1411
- ISSN
- 1382-4147 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7322
- OpenAlex
- W3024072514
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Heart Failure Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council (MR/R022739/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
- Keywords
- epicardial adipose tissue, exercise intervention, visceral fat, waist circumference, body mass index, HDL cholesterol, VO2, cardiovascular risk factors, exercise type comparison
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Adult, Humans, Quality of Life, Exercise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review