Meta-analysis of Cohen’s kappa
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Each (sub-)area can be considered as performing a parallel experiment on different subjects.
“Indeed each (sub-)area can be considered as performing a parallel experiment on different subjects (Sun 2011; Spiegelhalter 2005).”
From Do They Agree? Bibliometric Evaluation versus Informed Peer Review in the Italian Research Assessment Exercise (2016) · cites this paper as Sun 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 89 · Cited by 282
- Authors
- Sun, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sun, Shuyan
- ORCID
- Sun, Shuyan
- Venue
- Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology
- Published
- 2011-11-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 145-163
- ISSN
- 1387-3741 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9400
- OpenAlex
- W1976658129
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
- Keywords
- Cohen's kappa, inter-rater reliability, study heterogeneity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
