The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global diversity of aquatic macrophytes in freshwater
Open accessAbstract
Aquatic macrophytes are aquatic photosynthetic organisms, large enough to see with the naked eye, that actively grow permanently or periodically submerged below, floating on, or growing up through the water surface. Aquatic macrophytes are represented in seven plant divisions: Cyanobacteria, Chlorophyta, Rhodophyta, Xanthophyta, Bryophyta, Pteridophyta and Spermatophyta. Species composition and distribution of aquatic macrophytes in the more primitive divisions are less well known than for the vascular macrophytes (Pteridophyta and Spermatophyta), which are represented by 33 orders and 88 families with about 2,614 species in c. 412 genera. These c. 2,614 aquatic species of Pteridophyta and Spermatophyta evolved from land plants and represent only a small fraction (∼1%) of the total number of vascular plants. Our analysis of the numbers and distribution of vascular macrophytes showed that whilst many species have broad ranges, species diversity is highest in the Neotropics, intermediate in the Oriental, Nearctic and Afrotropics, lower in the Palearctic and Australasia, lower again in the Pacific Oceanic Islands, and lowest in the Antarctic region. About 39% of the c. 412 genera containing aquatic vascular macrophytes are endemic to a single biogeographic region, with 61–64% of all aquatic vascular plant species found in the Afrotropics and Neotropics being endemic to those regions. Aquatic macrophytes play an important role in the structure and function of aquatic ecosystems and certain macrophyte species (e.g., rice) are cultivated for human consumption, yet several of the worst invasive weeds in the world are aquatic plants. Many of the threats to fresh waters (e.g., climate change, eutrophication) will result in reduced macrophyte diversity and will, in turn, threaten the faunal diversity of aquatic ecosystems and favour the establishment of exotic species, at the expense of native species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ancestral chloroplast genome in Mesostigma viride reveals an early branch of green plant evolution
Lemieux, C., Otis, C., & Turmel, M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001059 · Cited by 277 · cited 2×
“Biologists have long acknowledged a link between green algae and terrestrial plants ( Lemieux et al., 2000; Chapman & Waters, 2002; Pombert et al., 2005; Turmel et al., 2006) with some suggesting specifically that the green algae known as stoneworts (Order Charales) are the extant sister group to all land plants (revi…”
Background
Cited by
Global loss of aquatic vegetation in lakes
Zhang, Y., Jeppesen, E., Liu, X., Qin, B., Shi, K., Zhou, Y., Thomaz, S. M., & Deng, J. (2017) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.08.013 · Cited by 426
Self-citationAlahuhta, J., Kosten, S., Akasaka, M., Auderset, D., Azzella, M. M., Bolpagni, R., Bove, C. P., Chambers, P. A., Chappuis, E., Clayton, J., et al. (2017) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12978 · Cited by 159
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chambers, P. A., Lacoul, P., Murphy, K. J., & Thomaz, S. M.
- Venue
- Hydrobiologia
- Published
- 2007-12-18
- Volume
- 595
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-26
- ISSN
- 0018-8158 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5117
- OpenAlex
- W2048329688
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global diversity of aquatic macrophytes in freshwater. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10750-007-9154-6
- The paper
- Chambers, P. A., Lacoul, P., Murphy, K. J., & Thomaz, S. M. (2008). Global diversity of aquatic macrophytes in freshwater. Hydrobiologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9154-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.