The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The impacts of drought on freshwater ecosystems: an Australian perspective
Open accessAbstract
Southeastern Australia is presently experiencing one of the worst droughts observed in the region in the last 200 years. The consequences of drought have been far reaching both for human consumptive uses and for aquatic ecosystems, and serve to highlight several important aspects of the nature of droughts, their ecological impacts, and how humans respond to them. Running water ecosystems are the dominant form of freshwater ecosystem in Australia, yet, despite the high frequency of drought we lack a basic understanding of the consequences of long-term droughts (as distinct from seasonal droughts) as an ecosystem disturbance, and more is known about drought effects on flowing than on standing waters. Drought is well defined and characterised meteorologically, but hydrologically its characterisation is equivocal. While drought severely impacts natural aquatic ecosystems, its effects have been and are exacerbated by direct and indirect anthropogenic modifications to streams and their catchments. In streams the major impacts are the loss of water and habitat availability, and the reduction, if not severing, of connectivity (lateral, longitudinal and vertical). Despite the relative frequency of drought in Australia we have failed to develop long-term management strategies capable of contending with droughts and their impacts, particularly in catchments where human disturbances have reduced the natural resistance and resilience of aquatic ecosystems, and where the demand for consumptive water use is high and rising. Here, we provide a commentary on drought and its implications for the management of freshwater ecosystems. We begin with a general discussion of drought and its impacts on streams and rivers before discussing some of the more specific management issues and response strategies that have arisen in response to the current drought in Australia. Throughout we consider global as well as local examples. We conclude by highlighting important knowledge gaps and by providing some general principles for better incorporating droughts and their impacts into river management strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Automated Water Extraction Index: A new technique for surface water mapping using Landsat imagery
Feyisa, G. L., Meilby, H., Fensholt, R., & Proud, S. R. (2014) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.029 · Cited by 2,105
Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments
(2014) · doi:10.5194/hess-18-5041-2014 · Cited by 513
Climate Change and River Ecosystems: Protection and Adaptation Options
Palmer, M. A., Lettenmaier, D. P., Poff, N. L., Postel, S. L., Richter, B., & Warner, R. (2009) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9329-1 · Cited by 445
Ecological impacts of excessive water level fluctuations in stratified freshwater lakes
Zohary, T., & Ostrovsky, I. (2011) · Inland Waters · doi:10.5268/iw-1.1.406 · Cited by 398
Pan-European seasonal trends and recent changes of drought frequency and severity
Spinoni, J., Naumann, G., & Vogt, J. V. (2017) · Global and Planetary Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.11.013 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Bond, N. R., Lake, P. S., & Arthington, A. H.
- Venue
- Hydrobiologia
- Published
- 2008-02-26
- Volume
- 600
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-16
- ISSN
- 0018-8158 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5117
- OpenAlex
- W2163596425
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impacts of drought on freshwater ecosystems: an Australian perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10750-008-9326-z
- The paper
- Bond, N. R., Lake, P. S., & Arthington, A. H. (2008). The impacts of drought on freshwater ecosystems: an Australian perspective. Hydrobiologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9326-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.