Fitting the Mold of Graduate School: A Qualitative Study of Socialization in Doctoral Education
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Student demographics and negative socialization experiences whereby students experience feelings of 'differentness' from their peers can affect overall satisfaction and integration into degree programs.
“Conversely, student demographics and negative socialization experiences whereby students experience feelings of 'differentness' from their peers (e.g., older adults, students with children, women, students of colour, part-time students) can affect overall satisfaction and integration into degree programs (Gardner, 2008; Greene, 2013; Offerman, 2011).”
From PhD Pathways in Canada: Sociodemographic and Disciplinary Influences That Impact Pathway, Duration, and Outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as Gardner, 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Racism camouflaged as impostorism and the impact on Black STEM doctoral students
McGee, E. O., Botchway, P. K., Naphan-Kingery, D. E., Brockman, A. J., Houston, S., & White, D. T. (2022) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2021.1924137 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
The experienced meaning of working with a PhD thesis
Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2012) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2011.599422 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Nelson, J., Walters, D., Jones, A., & Jacobs, S. (2026) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v15n1p34
- Authors
- Gardner, S. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Maine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gardner, Susan K.
- ORCID
- Gardner, Susan K.
- Venue
- Innovative Higher Education
- Published
- 2008-03-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-138
- ISSN
- 0742-5627 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1758
- OpenAlex
- W2027662868
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 22.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Innovative Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Keywords
- doctoral education, socialization, doctoral student attrition, student retention, underrepresented students, women in STEM, students of color, part-time students, older students, graduate school
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
