CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 762Evaluation of Teaching PracticesNames, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchGender, Sexuality, and Education

What's in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching

MacNell, Lillian, Driscoll, Adam, Hunt, Andrea N.·2015·Innovative Higher Education
DOI 10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results of experimental studies cast doubt on any clear positive causal relationship between satisfaction with the course and achievement.

    “The results of these studies also cast doubt on any clear (positive) causal relationship between satisfaction with the course and achievement.”

    From The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as MacNell et al., 2015

  • Experimental educational studies have demonstrated that student satisfaction with a course is biased based on objective measures.

    “When it comes to experimental research, a number of educational studies conducted in different parts of the world -including Italy (Braga, Paccagnella, & Pellizzari, 2014), France (Boring, 2015), and the United States (Arbuckle & Williams, 2003;Carrell & West, 2010;MacNell, Driscoll, & Hunt, 2015) -have demonstrated that student satisfaction with the course is biased (based on objective measures).”

    From The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as MacNell et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., & Hunt, A. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–La Crosse (US)
  • University of North Alabama (US)
Corresponding author
MacNell, Lillian
ORCID
Venue
Innovative Higher Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-12-05
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
291-303
ISSN
  • 0742-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1758
DOI
10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4
OpenAlex
W2089903103
Cited by
762
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 103 · 2020: 118 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 8
FWCI
152.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Innovative Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
Keywords
student ratings of teaching, gender bias, teacher gender, gender disguise, online courses, teaching evaluation, gender identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review