CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Political Economy and MarxismHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesMarxism and Critical Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Theorizing Capitalism’s Cracks

Open access
Dézsi, Attila, Wurst, LouAnn·2024·International Journal of Historical Archaeology
DOI 10.1007/s10761-022-00690-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

It is commonly said that it is easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism. Alternatives, framed as a simplistic dualism of capitalism vs communism, make it difficult to envision any alternative. Instead, the “sprouts” of communism lie concealed in capitalism, inherent in its contradictory logic and the twofold nature of labor. We present this theoretical framing so that our archaeological work can focus on people’s ‘other doing’ and suggest that it will always be difficult to envision alternatives to our capitalist present until we reclaim the inspiration that exists internal to capitalism itself.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10761-022-00690-3

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Eagleton, T. (2003). After Theory. Basic, New York.
  2. Harman, C. (2009). Zombie Capitalism. Haymarket, Chicago.
  3. Holloway, J. (2014). Communize. In Brincat, S. (ed.), Communism in the 21st Century, Vol. 3. Praeger, Santa Barbara, CA, pp. 213-221.
  4. Holloway, J. (2018). Revolt or revolution or get out of the way, capital! In Bonefeld, W. and Tischler, S. (eds.), What is to be Done?: Leninism, anti-Leninist Marxism and the Question of Revolution Today. Routledge, London, pp. 196-206.
  5. Marx, K. (1967). Capital. International, New York.
  6. McGuire, R. H. (1992). A Marxist Archaeology. Academic, San Diego.
  7. Ollman, B. (2014). Communism: the utopian "Marxist vision" versus a dialectical and scientific Marxist approach. In Brincat, S. (ed.), Communism in the 21st Century, Vol. 1. Praeger, Santa Barbara, CA, pp. 63-81.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dézsi, A., & Wurst, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Michigan Technological University (US)
Corresponding author
Wurst, LouAnn
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Historical Archaeology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2023-01-24
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 1092-7697 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7748
DOI
10.1007/s10761-022-00690-3
OpenAlex
W3081882288
Cited by
2
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 2
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal of Historical Archaeology (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University) (submittedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Marxism and Critical Theory
Keywords
capitalism, communism, alternatives to capitalism, end of capitalism, dualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review