Cited by 9Indian and Buddhist StudiesSouth Asian Studies and DiasporaClassical Studies and Philology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sharing a Single Seat: The Poetics and Politics of Male Intimacy in the Vikramāṅkakāvya

Cox, Whitney·2010·Journal of Indian Philosophy

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10781-010-9099-3

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Ali D. (2004) Courtly culture and political life in early India. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  2. Archaeological Survey of Madras. (1887) Annual report of epigraphy. Government Press, Madras
  3. Bronner, Y. (2010). The poetics of ambivalence: Imagining and unimagining the political in Bilhaṇa’s Vikramāṅkadevacarita. Journal of Indian Philosophy. doi: 10.1007/s10781-010-9100-1 . · DOI
  4. Burgess J. (1876) Book notices: The Vikramāṅkadevacharita [...] edited with an introduction by Georg Buhler. The Indian Antiqury 5(1): 324–327
  5. Cox W. (2010a) Scribe and script in the Cālukya West Deccan. Indian Economic and Social History Review 47(1): 1–28 · DOI
  6. Cox, W. (forthcoming). Saffron in the rasam. In Y. Bronner, W. Cox, & L. McCrea (Eds.), New directions in South Asian studies in honor of Sheldon Pollock.
  7. Fleet, J.F. (1894). Dynasties of the Canarese districts of the Bombay Presidency. Government Central Press, Bombay
  8. Gerow E. (1994) Abhinavagupta’s aesthetics as speculative paradigm. Journal of the American Oriental Society 114(2): 186–208 · DOI
  9. McCrea L. (2009) The teleology of poetry in Kashmir. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
  10. McCrea, L. (2010). Poetry beyond good and evil: Bilhaṇa and the tradition of patron-centered court epic. Journal of Indian Philosophy. doi: 10.1007/s10781-010-9098-4 . · DOI
  11. Miller B. (1984) The theater of memory: The plays of Kālidāsa. Columbia University Press, New York
  12. Mishra B.N. (1976) Studies on Bilhaṇa and his Vikramāṅkadevacarita. K. B. Publications, New Delhi
  13. Nagar M.L. (1992) Bilhaṇa’s Vikramāṅkadevacarita and its neo-expounders. International Library Center, Colombia, MO
  14. Pollock, S. (Ed and Translator.). (2007). Rama’s last act. New York: New York University Press.
  15. Raghavan V. (1967) The number of Rasas. Adyar Library, Madras
  16. Raghavan V. (1973) Studies in some concepts of the Alaṃkāraśāstra. Adyar Library, Madras

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cox, W.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Cox, Whitney
Venue
Journal of Indian Philosophy
Published
2010-09-02
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
485-501
ISSN
  • 0022-1791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0395
OpenAlex
W2149503646
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
32.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Indian Philosophy (publishedVersion)
  • Center for International and Regional Studies (Georgetown University) (submittedVersion)
  • SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › South Asian Studies and Diaspora
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
Keywords
male intimacy, royal praise, court poetry, Mahakavya, poetics and politics, Sanskrit epic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review