The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A security-and quality-aware system architecture for Internet of Things
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, high-level data security positively contributes to data accuracy (the degree of similarity of a measured quantity to its actual value), precision (the degree to which further calculations return the same or similar results), and timeliness (the temporal validity of data).”
From A Systematic Review of Data Quality in CPS and IoT for Industry 4.0 (2023) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“Only three papers [38,39,51] study the tradeoff between data quality and security.”
From A Systematic Review of Data Quality in CPS and IoT for Industry 4.0 (2023) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“The evaluation of the proposed architecture reveals that high-security scores may lead to low-level data completeness (the number of collected values over a given time interval divided by the number of expected values).”
From A Systematic Review of Data Quality in CPS and IoT for Industry 4.0 (2023) · cites this paper as [38]
Citations
Cites
The Internet of Things: A survey
Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 · Cited by 15,613
Role-based access control models
Sandhu, R. S., Coyne, E. J., Feinstein, H. L., & Youman, C. E. (1996) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.485845 · Cited by 5,927
(2011) · Cited by 5,203
Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers
Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099 · Cited by 4,672
Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges
Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., Pellegrini, F. D., & Imrich Chlamtac, A. (2012) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016 · Cited by 3,629
Self-citationService-Oriented Computing: State of the Art and Research Challenges
Papazoglou, M., Traverso, P., Dustdar, S., & Leymann, F. (2007) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2007.400 · Cited by 1,950
Representing and using nonfunctional requirements: a process-oriented approach
Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., & Nixon, B. A. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.142871 · Cited by 1,019
Data Quality : Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques
Batini, C., & Scannapieco, M. (2006) · doi:10.1007/3-540-33173-5 · Cited by 664
Handling obstacles in goal-oriented requirements engineering
van Lamsweerde, A., & Letier, E. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.879820 · Cited by 653
Modeling Data and Process Quality in Multi-Input, Multi-Output Information Systems
Ballou, D. P., & Pazer, H. L. (1985) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.31.2.150 · Cited by 542
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Security, privacy and trust in Internet of Things: The road ahead
Sicari, S., Rizzardi, A., Grieco, L. A., & Coen‐Porisini, A. (2014) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2014.11.008 · Cited by 2,341
Self-citationInternet of Things security: A survey
Alaba, F. A., Othman, M., Hashem, M., & Alotaibi, F. A. (2017) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2017.04.002 · Cited by 1,348
Allioui, H., & Mourdi, Y. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23198015 · Cited by 721
The Internet of Things: Review and theoretical framework
Nord, J. H., Koohang, A. A., & Paliszkiewicz, J. O. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.014 · Cited by 492
Data Quality in Internet of Things: A state-of-the-art survey
Karkouch, A., Mousannif, H., Al Moatassime, H., & Noel, T. (2016) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2016.08.002 · Cited by 378
Metadata
- Authors
- Sicari, S., Cappiello, C., De Pellegrini, F., Miorandi, D., & Coen-Porisini, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Insubria (IT)
- Politecnico di Milano (IT)
- U-Hopper (Italy) (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Cappiello, Cinzia
- Venue
- Information Systems Frontiers
- Published
- 2014-11-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 665-677
- ISSN
- 1387-3326 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9419
- OpenAlex
- W2139852291
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 9.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Information Systems Frontiers (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- IrInSubria (University of Insubria) (submittedVersion)
- Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Keywords
- Internet of Things, IoT architecture, security (computing), privacy, data quality, trustworthiness, data heterogeneity, robustness, reliability, IoT services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
