The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Influences of Teacher Knowledge and Authentic Formative Assessment on Student Learning in Technology Education
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A factor identified in numerous AfL studies, although not found in the DBDM literature, concerns skills related to providing feedback to students”
From Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice (2020) · cites this paper as Fox-Turnbull, 2006
In the citing paper
“Content: High-quality feedback is needed that is honest, concise and yet sufficiently detailed (Fox-Turnbull, 2006; Hargreaves, 2013; Peterson & Irving, 2008).”
From Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice (2020) · cites this paper as Fox-Turnbull, 2006
Citations
Cites
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645
Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context
Rogoff, B. (1990) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001 · Cited by 4,709
Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010) · Phi Delta Kappan · doi:10.1177/003172171009200119 · Cited by 4,231
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- S. Clarke, 2003, Unlocking Formative Assessment – Practical Strategies for Enhancing Learning in the Primary and Intermediate Classroom
- Compton, V. & Harwood, C.: 1999, TEALS Research Project Starting Points and Future Directions. Paper presented at the Telecom Technology Education Conference, King’s College, Auckland: 14–16 April
- R. L. R. Freeman, 1998, Planning and Implementing Assessment
- S. Hennessy, 1993, Studies in Science Education, 22, 1, 10.1080/03057269308560019 · DOI
- S. Hennessy, 1999, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9, 1, 10.1023/A:1008855526312 · DOI
- Hill, A. M. & Smith, H. A.: 1998, Practice Meets Theory in Technology Education: A Case of Authentic Learning in a High School Setting. Journal of Technology, 9(2) · DOI
- R. Kimbell, 1997, Assessing Technology International Trends in Curriculum and Assessment
- R. McCormick, 1997, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 141, 10.1023/A:1008819912213 · DOI
- C. McGee, 2001, The Professional Practice of Teaching 2
- Ministry of Education, 1995, Technology in the New Zealand Curriculum
- J. Moreland, 2001, Enhancing Student Learning in Technology Through Teacher Technological Literacy
- A. Pacey, 1983, The Culture of Technology
- R. Sutton, 1995, Assessment for Learning
- W. Turnbull, 2002, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12, 23, 10.1023/A:1013056129283 · DOI
- G. Wiggins, 1998, Educative Assessment Designing Assessment to Inform and Improve Student Performance
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice
Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Fox-Turnbull, W.
- Corresponding author
- Fox-Turnbull, Wendy
- ORCID
- Fox-Turnbull, Wendy
- Venue
- International Journal of Technology and Design Education
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-77
- ISSN
- 0957-7572 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1804
- OpenAlex
- W1989273685
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 13.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- International Journal of Technology and Design Education (publishedVersion)
- UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- teacher knowledge, feedback, teacher intervention, assessment context, academic performance, technology education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
