The Role of Simple Emotion Recognition Skills among School Aged Boys at Risk of ADHD
Abstract
Poor social skills and behavioral problems are a major component of ADHD. The different explanations offered so far, such as cognitive deficits and deficient self regulation, have not been able fully to account for the various aspects of the social dysfunction, suggesting that other mechanisms might underlay this impairment. Our study sought to assess the emotion recognition of Israeli boys at risk of ADHD, and to evaluate its associations with their social skills. A group of 111 boys (grades 4 and 5) were assigned to an At-risk (n=50) and a control (n=61) group based on their scores in an ADHD symptoms questionnaire. The two groups were matched on age, socio-economic status and class and school environment. Group comparisons revealed that compared to their non-At-risk counterparts, At-risk boys have impaired emotion recognition. Finally, multiple groups Structural Equation Modeling analyses (SEM) demonstrated that emotion misrecognition plays a significant role in the At-risk children's social functioning and behavioral problems compared to its role in the social competence and behavioral problems among the comparison group. Implications for the understanding and treatment of social skills problems among children at risk of ADHD are proposed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ADHD is related to deficiencies in both emotion regulation and emotion recognition.
“a few studies have shown that ADHD is related to deficiencies in both emotion regulation (e.g., Maedgen & Carlson, 2000; Walcott & Landau, 2004) and emotion recognition (e.g., Kats-Gold, Besser, & Priel, 2007; Sinzig, Morsch, & Lehmkuhl, 2008; Yuill & Lyon, 2007).”
From Multiple deficits in ADHD: executive dysfunction, delay aversion, reaction time variability, and emotional deficits (2013) · cites this paper as Kats-Gold, Besser, & Priel, 2007
Earlier reports of social cognition deficits in ADHD might be explained by elevated ASD symptoms in those patients.
“Previous studies documenting on social cognition deficits in ADHD [47][48][49] may therefore possibly be explained by elevated levels of ASD symptoms in these ADHD patients.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 100 · Cited by 139
- Authors
- Kats-Gold, I., Besser, A., & Priel, B.
- Affiliations
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Priel, Beatriz
- Venue
- Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
- Published
- 2007-01-23
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 363-378
- ISSN
- 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2835
- OpenAlex
- W2077345157
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- emotion recognition, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, vulnerable children, social skills, behavioral problems, social competence, social dysfunction
- MeSH terms
- Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Israel, Male, Parents, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Social Adjustment, Social Behavior Disorders, Social Class, Social Perception, Students, Teaching, Visual Perception, Comorbidity, Recognition, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review