Cited by 538Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentEarly Childhood Education and Development

Feasibility and Preliminary Outcomes of a School-Based Mindfulness Intervention for Urban Youth

Mendelson, Tamar, Greenberg, Mark T., Dariotis, Jacinda K., Gould, Laura Feagans, Rhoades, Brittany L., Leaf, Philip J.·2010·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Youth in underserved, urban communities are at risk for a range of negative outcomes related to stress, including social-emotional difficulties, behavior problems, and poor academic performance. Mindfulness-based approaches may improve adjustment among chronically stressed and disadvantaged youth by enhancing self-regulatory capacities. This paper reports findings from a pilot randomized controlled trial assessing the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of a school-based mindfulness and yoga intervention. Four urban public schools were randomized to an intervention or wait-list control condition (n=97 fourth and fifth graders, 60.8% female). It was hypothesized that the 12-week intervention would reduce involuntary stress responses and improve mental health outcomes and social adjustment. Stress responses, depressive symptoms, and peer relations were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Findings suggest the intervention was attractive to students, teachers, and school administrators and that it had a positive impact on problematic responses to stress including rumination, intrusive thoughts, and emotional arousal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-010-9418-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 538

Authors
Mendelson, T., Greenberg, M. T., Dariotis, J. K., Gould, L. F., Rhoades, B. L., & Leaf, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Academy for Educational Development (US)
Corresponding author
Mendelson, Tamar
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2010-05-04
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
985-994
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2143867719
Cited by
538
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 20
FWCI
20.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Mind and Life Institute
  • One Mind
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, yoga, school-based intervention, urban youth, childhood stress, social-emotional adjustment, depressive symptoms, peer relationships, rumination, intrusive thoughts, emotional arousal, self-regulation, feasibility and acceptability, underserved populations, elementary school students
MeSH terms
Affect, Arousal, Attention, Awareness, Behavior Therapy, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interpersonal Relations, Learning Disabilities, Male, Minority Groups, Peer Group, Pilot Projects, Poverty Areas, School Health Services, Social Adjustment, Stress, Psychological, Urban Population, Yoga, Baltimore

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review