Cited by 92Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Cognitive risk and protective factors for suicidal ideation: A two year longitudinal study in adolescence

Open access
Burke, Taylor A., Connolly, Samantha L., Hamilton, Jessica L., Stange, Jonathan P., Abramson, Lyn Y., Alloy, Lauren B.·2016·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Adolescence is a developmental period associated with heightened risk for both the onset and escalation of suicidal ideation (SI). Given that SI is a potent predictor of suicidal behavior, it is important to develop models of vulnerability for and protection against SI, particularly among young adolescents. This study examined the relative impact of several cognitive vulnerabilities, as well as protective factors, for SI among young adolescents over a 2-year interval encompassing their transition to mid-adolescence. At baseline, 324 adolescents (M = 12.39 years; SD = 0.63; 52.5 % female) completed measures of depressive symptoms, self-referent information processing biases, negative inferential style, and responses to negative affect. Further, the adolescents and their mothers were administered a diagnostic interview to assess current and past depressive disorders and SI. Over follow-up, adolescents and their mothers were administered the diagnostic interview every 12 months and adolescents completed a self-report measure inquiring about SI every 6 months to assess interviewer-rated and self-reported SI. Logistic regressions indicated that preferential endorsement of negative adjectives as self-referent (only among girls), rumination in response to negative affect, and a negative inferential style prospectively predicted SI. Additionally, young adolescents' tendency to respond to negative affect with distraction and problem-solving buffered against their risk for exhibiting SI. When these factors were entered simultaneously, preferential endorsement of negative adjectives as self-referent and the use of distraction and problem-solving skills remained the only significant prospective predictors of SI. No previous studies have examined these variables as predictors of SI, thereby highlighting their potential utility in improving the predictive validity of extant models of suicide risk and resilience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-015-0104-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 91 · Cited by 92

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Beck AT Cognitive models of depression. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, An International Quarterly 1987 1 5 37
  2. Mennin DS Fresco DM Emotion regulation therapy. Handbook of emotion regulation 2014 The Guilford Press New York
  3. Sheehy N O'Connor RC Palmer S Cognitive style and suicidal behavior Suicide: Strategies and interventions for reduction and prevention 2014 Routledge New York

Authors
Burke, T. A., Connolly, S. L., Hamilton, J. L., Stange, J. P., Abramson, L. Y., & Alloy, L. B.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
  • Burke, Taylor A.
  • Connolly, Samantha L.
  • Hamilton, Jessica L.
  • Stange, Jonathan P.
  • Abramson, Lyn Y.
  • Alloy, Lauren B.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2015-11-23
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1145-1160
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2174969201
Cited by
92
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH079369, F31MH106181, F31MH106184, R01MH101168, F31MH099761)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
suicidal ideation, adolescents, cognitive vulnerability, protective factors, rumination, negative affect, distraction, problem solving, depressive symptoms, suicide risk, resilience, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Attention, Child, Cognition, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Problem Solving, Psychological Tests, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review