Prospective Association between Childhood Behavioral Inhibition and Anxiety: a Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Behavioral inhibition (BI) is a risk factor for anxiety. However, the estimates of the strength of this association vary widely. In addition, while BI is a strong predictor of social anxiety disorder (SAD), its association with other anxiety disorders is unclear. The current study sought to establish the relationship between BI and anxiety and to quantify this association for a range of anxiety disorders. We searched PsycInfo, PubMed and Embase for articles published before May 18th, 2019 using search terms for BI, anxiety and prospective study design. We selected articles which assessed the prospective relationship between BI in childhood and anxiety. Using random-effects meta-analysis with robust variance estimation, which allowed for the inclusion of multiple follow-ups of the same sample, we established the association between BI and any anxiety. We also explored the association between BI and individual anxiety disorders. Data from 27 studies consisting of 35 follow-ups of 20 unique samples indicated that BI prospectively increases the odds of anxiety (OR = 2.80, 95% CI 2.03 to 3.86, p < 0.001). There was also a positive association between BI and all individual anxiety disorders, with effect sizes ranging from small in the case of specific phobia (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.14, p = 0.03) to large in the case of SAD (OR = 5.84, 95% CI 3.38 to 10.09, p < 0.001). BI in early childhood is a strong risk factor for anxiety. Targeting BI may help reduce the number of children…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ICD-11 contains contradictions regarding differentiation between ASD and anxiety disorders.
“These contradictions in the description might convey confusion rather than clarify diagnostic criteria and enhance differentiation.”
From Autism spectrum disorder in ICD-11—a critical reflection of its possible impact on clinical practice and research (2024) · cites this paper as [21]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 69 · Cited by 134
- Authors
- Sandstrom, A., Uher, R., & Pavlova, B.
- Affiliations
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Venue
- Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
- Published
- 2019-10-22
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-66
- ISSN
- 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
- 2730-7166
- 2730-7174
- OpenAlex
- W2982081595
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canada Research Chairs (231397)
- Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation (833)
- Dalhousie University (Summer Studentship)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Keywords
- behavioral inhibition, childhood anxiety, anxiety disorders, social anxiety disorder, specific phobia, risk factors, early childhood, prospective associations, child temperament
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Child Behavior, Child Development, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Prospective Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review