Cited by 13Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Preschool neuropsychological predictors of school-aged sluggish cognitive tempo and inattentive behaviors

Open access
Becker, Stephen P., Dvorsky, Melissa R., Tamm, Leanne, Willoughby, Michael T.·2021·Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology

Abstract

Sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) is characterized by excessive daydreaming, slowed thinking, and mental confusion and ‘fogginess’. A growing body of research supports the empirical differentiation of sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) from the inattentive (IN) behaviors that characterize attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Further SCT and IN are uniquely associated with clinical correlates across academic, social, and emotional domains; however, there is limited understanding of how neuropsychological functioning contributes to SCT and/or IN behaviors. The two broad domains of neuropsychological functioning that have been most frequently examined in relation to SCT behaviors are processing speed and executive functions (EF). The present study tested whether EF and processing speed measured when children were on average age five years were predictive of teacher-rated IN and SCT behaviors in 1st – 3rd grades. Participants included 1,022 children from the Family Life Project, an ongoing prospective longitudinal study of child development in low-income, non-metropolitan communities. EF and processing speed uniquely made independent contributions to the prediction of IN and SCT. In secondary analyses that focused on specific facets of EF and processing speed, inhibitory control and working memory abilities predicted lower IN but not SCT behaviors, whereas slower processing speed significantly predicted both greater SCT and IN behaviors. These results are discussed as they inform developmental models of SCT and IN.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-020-00728-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies in early childhood generally showed weak associations between CDS and slowed processing speed, while studies of older children and adults had mixed findings.

    “Other evidence to support a link between CDS and a slowed processing speed comes from studies in early childhood [30, 31, 33] that generally showed weak associations, whereas studies of older children and adults have had mixed findings [10, 13, 14, 29, 32-40].”
  • These null results for CDS with planning, cognitive interference accuracy, and response inhibition match prior child studies that found no CDS link to planning tasks, Stroop accuracy, or response inhibition.

    “These findings are consistent with previous work in children which reported no association of CDS and planning tasks (Tower of Hanoi [19] and CANTAB Stockings Task [9]), Stroop accuracy [19], or response inhibition [5,8,61].”
  • Of the three remaining studies on CDS and Go/NoGo omissions in children and adolescents, results were mixed: two found CDS linked to more Gordan Diagnostic System Go/NoGo omission errors, and one found no link to Test of Variables of Attention omissions.

    “The three remaining studies which reported on CDS and GNG omissions in children and teens reported mixed findings; two reported CDS was associated with more Gordan Diagnostic System GNG omission errors [4,5] and one reported no association between CDS and Test of Variables of Attention omissions [8].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 13

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: Fouth Edition (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  2. Becker SP, & Barkley RA (2018). Sluggish cognitive tempo In Banaschewski T, Coghill D, & Zuddas A (Eds.), Oxford textbook of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (pp. 147– 153). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  3. Dunn LM, & Dunn DM (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Fourth Edition (PPVT-IV). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.
  4. Muthén LK, & Muthén BO (1998-2019). Mplus user’s guide (Eigth ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

Authors
Becker, S. P., Dvorsky, M. R., Tamm, L., & Willoughby, M. T.
Affiliations
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • Children's National (US)
  • RTI International (US)
Corresponding author
  • Becker, Stephen P.
  • Willoughby, Michael T.
Venue
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
Published
2020-12-28
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
197-210
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 2730-7166
  • 2730-7174
OpenAlex
W3117025218
Cited by
13
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UG3OD023332)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH122839, K23MH108603)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD039667)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
sluggish cognitive tempo, inattentive behavior, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, executive function, processing speed, inhibitory control, working memory, preschool children, teacher ratings, child development, low-income communities, Family Life Project
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies, Schools, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review