Cited by 99Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesMental Health and Psychiatry

Redefining Autism Spectrum Disorder Using DSM-5: The Implications of the Proposed DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorders

Young, Robyn L., Rodi, Melissa L.·2014·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

A number of changes were made to pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs) in the recently released diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (APA, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, VA, 2013). Of the 210 participants in the present study who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for a PDD [i.e., autistic disorder, Asperger's disorder and pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS)], only 57.1% met DSM-5 criteria (specificity = 1.0) for autism spectrum disorder when criteria were applied concurrently during diagnostic assessment. High-functioning individuals (i.e., Asperger's disorder and PDD-NOS) were less likely to meet DSM-5 criteria than those with autistic disorder. A failure to satisfy all three criteria in the social-communication domain was the most common reason for exclusion (39%). The implications of these results are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-013-1927-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All except Young and Rodi (2014) used earlier proposed versions rather than the full DSM-5 criteria released in 2013.

    “All except Young and Rodi (2014) used earlier proposed versions rather than the full DSM-5 criteria released in 2013.”

    From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as Young & Rodi, 2014

  • 73.9% of adults meeting DSM-IV criteria also meet DSM-5 criteria.

    “73.9% of adults meeting DSM-IV criteria also meet DSM-5 criteria.”

    From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as Young and Rodi (2014)

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 20 · Cited by 99

Authors
Young, R. L., & Rodi, M. L.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Young, Robyn L.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2013-09-22
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
758-765
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2070731592
Cited by
99
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, DSM-5, diagnostic criteria, pervasive developmental disorders, autistic disorder, Asperger syndrome, pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified, high-functioning autism, social communication, diagnostic specificity, diagnostic exclusion
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Social Behavior, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review