Redefining Autism Spectrum Disorder Using DSM-5: The Implications of the Proposed DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorders
Abstract
A number of changes were made to pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs) in the recently released diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (APA, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, VA, 2013). Of the 210 participants in the present study who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for a PDD [i.e., autistic disorder, Asperger's disorder and pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS)], only 57.1% met DSM-5 criteria (specificity = 1.0) for autism spectrum disorder when criteria were applied concurrently during diagnostic assessment. High-functioning individuals (i.e., Asperger's disorder and PDD-NOS) were less likely to meet DSM-5 criteria than those with autistic disorder. A failure to satisfy all three criteria in the social-communication domain was the most common reason for exclusion (39%). The implications of these results are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All except Young and Rodi (2014) used earlier proposed versions rather than the full DSM-5 criteria released in 2013.
“All except Young and Rodi (2014) used earlier proposed versions rather than the full DSM-5 criteria released in 2013.”
From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as Young & Rodi, 2014
73.9% of adults meeting DSM-IV criteria also meet DSM-5 criteria.
“73.9% of adults meeting DSM-IV criteria also meet DSM-5 criteria.”
From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as Young and Rodi (2014)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 20 · Cited by 99
- Authors
- Young, R. L., & Rodi, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Flinders University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Young, Robyn L.
- ORCID
- Young, Robyn L.
- Venue
- Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
- Published
- 2013-09-22
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 758-765
- ISSN
- 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3432
- OpenAlex
- W2070731592
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, DSM-5, diagnostic criteria, pervasive developmental disorders, autistic disorder, Asperger syndrome, pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified, high-functioning autism, social communication, diagnostic specificity, diagnostic exclusion
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Social Behavior, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review