Cited by 70Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchLanguage Development and DisordersStuttering Research and Treatment

Uh, Um, and Autism: Filler Disfluencies as Pragmatic Markers in Adolescents with Optimal Outcomes from Autism Spectrum Disorder

Open access
Irvine, Christina A., Eigsti, Inge-Marie, Fein, Deborah A.·2016·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Filler disfluencies--uh and um--are thought to serve distinct discourse functions. We examined fillers in spontaneous speech by youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), who struggle with pragmatic language, and by youth with ASD who have achieved an 'optimal outcome' (OO), as well as in peers with typical development (TD). While uh rates did not differ, participants with ASD produced um less frequently than OO or TD groups. Um rate was associated with autism symptom severity, but not executive function or language abilities, suggesting that um serves a pragmatic, listener-oriented function. Moreover, in contrast to minimal production in ASD, the typical OO um production substantiates the normalization of subtle social communication in this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-015-2651-y

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UM use by 8- to 21-year-olds normalizes when overall ASD symptoms drop off.

    “Subsequent research showed that UM use by 8- to 21-year-olds normalizes when overall ASD symptoms drop off [28, 46], again lending support to the hypothesis that UM is associated with social competence.”

    From Linguistic camouflage in girls with autism spectrum disorder (2017) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Prior research shows that children and adolescents with ASD produce more fillers when cognitive demands are high.

    “Prior research shows that children and adolescents with ASD produce more fillers when cognitive demands are high [28]”

    From Linguistic camouflage in girls with autism spectrum disorder (2017) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Unusually low UM ratios have been reported in children/adolescents with ASD.

    “Unusually low UM ratios have been reported in children/adolescents with ASD [28]”

    From Linguistic camouflage in girls with autism spectrum disorder (2017) · cites this paper as [28]

  • We analyzed UM/UH data from the largest group of individuals with ASD reported to date (65 in this study vs. 50 in [24] and 24 in [28]).

    “We analyzed UM/UH data from the largest group of individuals with ASD reported to date (65 in this study vs. 50 in [24] and 24 in [28]).”

    From Linguistic camouflage in girls with autism spectrum disorder (2017) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Our results are based on longer language samples than prior research (e.g., 20 min vs. 60 s in [28]).

    “Our results are based on longer language samples than prior research (e.g., 20 min vs. 60 s in [28]).”

    From Linguistic camouflage in girls with autism spectrum disorder (2017) · cites this paper as [28]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 70

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders IV-TR (IV-TR ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  2. Semel E, Wiig EH, & Secord WA (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, Inc.
  3. Wechsler D (1999). Manual for the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (1 ed.). New York: Pearson Psychological Corporation.

Authors
Irvine, C. A., Eigsti, I.-M., & Fein, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Eigsti, Inge-Marie
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2015-11-19
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
1061-1070
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2178954357
Cited by
70
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Mental Health (R01 MH076189)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, um, pragmatic language, spontaneous speech, adolescents, autism severity, social communication, executive function, language skills
MeSH terms
Social Communication Disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Aptitude, Child, Communication, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Photic Stimulation, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review