Cited by 81Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Animal Learning Development

Brief report: examining executive and social functioning in elementary-aged children with autism

Open access
Freeman, Laura MacMullen, Locke, Jill, Rotheram-Fuller, Erin, Mandell, David·2017·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

There is a paucity of literature examining the relationship between executive and social functioning in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Twenty-three school-aged children with ASD participated. Executive functioning was measured using the Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment, Second Edition and Differential Ability Scales, Second Edition, and the teacher-rated Behavior Rating of Inventory of Executive Function. Independent assessors observed children's social functioning on the playground while children with ASD and their peers completed a survey to measure peer friendships and rejections. Overall, poorer executive functioning was associated with increased playground isolation and less engagement with peers. This suggests that metacognitive skills such as initiation, working memory, and planning and organization are associated with children's social functioning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-017-3079-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 81

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Elliott CD 2007 Differential Ability Scales-ll San Antonio, TX Pearson
  2. Korkman M Kirk U Kemp S 2007 NEPSY-Second Edition (NEPSY-II) San Antonio, TX Harcourt Assessment

Authors
Freeman, L. M., Locke, J., Rotheram-Fuller, E., & Mandell, D.
Affiliations
  • Phoenix Children's Hospital (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Locke, Jill
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2017-03-04
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
1890-1895
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2591593138
Cited by
81
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH100199)
  • Autism Science Foundation (11-1010, 13-ECA-01L)
  • FARFund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, executive function, social functioning, elementary school students, peer rejection, peer friendships, social isolation, metacognitive skills, working memory, planning and organization, peer engagement
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Peer Group, Social Adjustment, Friends, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review