Cited by 149Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDisability Education and EmploymentInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

The experiences of college students on the autism spectrum: a comparison to their neurotypical peers

McLeod, Jane D., Meanwell, Emily, Hawbaker, Amelia·2019·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

This study describes the academic, social, and health experiences of college students on the autism spectrum as they compare to students with other disabilities and their non-disabled, neurotypical peers. Data were from an online survey of college students at 14 public institutions (N = 3073). There were few significant differences between students on the spectrum and students with other disabilities. Both groups of students reported significantly worse outcomes than neurotypical students on academic performance, social relationships and bullying, and physical and mental health. The findings suggest that some of the challenges students on the spectrum face in college result from the stigma and social rejection associated with disability rather than from the unique characteristics of autism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-019-03910-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Obtaining a clear picture of outcomes for neurodivergent students at university is complex because many do not disclose their diagnosis, and others may not have a formal diagnosis when they commence their studies.

    “Obtaining a clear picture of outcomes for neurodivergent students at university is complex, not least because many do not disclose their diagnosis, and others may not have a formal diagnosis when they commence their studies (McLeod et al., 2019; Clouder et al., 2020).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 100 · Cited by 149

Authors
McLeod, J. D., Meanwell, E., & Hawbaker, A.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
McLeod, Jane D.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2019-02-02
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
2320-2336
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2914644561
Cited by
149
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Sociology, Indiana University (NA)
  • Office of the Vice Provost for Research, Indiana University (NA)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, university students, neurotypical peers, disability comparison, academic performance, interpersonal relationships, bullying, mental health, physical health, disability stigma, social rejection, higher education
MeSH terms
Academic Performance, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Psychological Distance, Students, Universities, Young Adult, Social Stigma, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review