Identification of Native Vowels in Normal and Whispered Speech by Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Abstract
The present study aims to investigate the identification of native vowel categories by adult individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and estimate their reaction times in both normal and whisper registers; their responses were compared with those of typically developing individuals. The results demonstrated that there was no deficit for individuals with ASD in normal speech, but their responses in the whispered speech were impaired. Also, individuals with ASD responded quicker than controls in normal speech but slower in the whispered speech; still, their responses were quicker than the responses of the controls in the whispered mode. The findings can have implications for the understanding of auditory sensitivities and auditory processing time in individuals with ASD as well as for clinical practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ASD patients tend to display worst performance in whispered speech compared to normal speech.
“Studies have found that ASD patients tend to display worst performance in whispered speech compared to normal speech (Venker et al. 2019; Georgiou 2020) and several differences have been reported in terms of language processing and speech perception (Table 4).”
From Autism Spectrum Disorder and auditory sensory alterations: a systematic review on the integrity of cognitive and neuronal functions related to auditory processing (2023) · cites this paper as Georgiou 2020
Cites
Whitehouse, A. J. O., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2008) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00697.x · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gonçalves, A. M., & Monteiro, P. (2023) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-023-02595-9 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
- Authors
- Georgiou, G. P.
- Affiliations
- Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Georgiou, Georgios P.
- Venue
- Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
- Published
- 2020-09-14
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 858-862
- ISSN
- 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3432
- OpenAlex
- W3086343007
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2020-10-15)
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, vowel recognition, whispered speech, auditory processing, reaction time, auditory sensitivity, speech perception, autistic adults
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adult, Auditory Perception, Humans, Reaction Time, Speech, Speech Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
