Turning a Blind Eye: Faculty Who Ignore Student Cheating
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Instructors report that mitigating academic dishonesty is time-intensive, emotionally distressing, and often accompanied by fear of retaliation.
“Instructors report that doing so is time-intensive (Coren, 2011), emotionally distressing (Keith-Spiegel, Tabachnick, Whitley, & Washburn, 1998), and often accompanied by the fear of retaliation from the students they confront (Davis et al., 2012).”
From Maintaining Academic Integrity Through AI-Trap Questions (2025) · cites this paper as Coren, 2011
Mitigating academic dishonesty is among the least enjoyable aspects of online instruction.
“Survey research indicates that mitigating academic dishonesty is among the least enjoyable aspects of online instruction.”
From Maintaining Academic Integrity Through AI-Trap Questions (2025) · cites this paper as Coren, 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 71
- Authors
- Coren, A.
- Affiliations
- Kwantlen Polytechnic University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Coren, Arthur
- Venue
- Journal of Academic Ethics
- Published
- 2011-08-26
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 291-305
- ISSN
- 1570-1727 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8544
- OpenAlex
- W2001051036
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Academic Ethics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
- Keywords
- academic dishonesty, faculty attitudes, faculty beliefs, faculty stress, emotional avoidance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
