The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computer-aided drug design platform using PyMOL
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196
Trott, O., & Olson, A. J. (2010) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21334 · Cited by 38,412
AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility
Morris, G. M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., Sanner, M. F., Belew, R. K., Goodsell, D. S., & Olson, A. J. (2009) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21256 · Cited by 25,486
GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation
Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van der Spoel, D., & Lindahl, E. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct700301q · Cited by 15,908
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
ZINC − A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening
Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2005) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci049714+ · Cited by 4,058
Pearlman, D. A., Case, D. A., Caldwell, J. W., Ross, W. S., Cheatham, T. E., DeBolt, S., Ferguson, D., Seibel, G., & Kollman, P. (1995) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/0010-4655(95)00041-d · Cited by 3,124
Ligand docking and binding site analysis with PyMOL and Autodock/Vina
Seeliger, D., & de Groot, B. L. (2010) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-010-9352-6 · Cited by 2,623
Onufriev, A., Bashford, D., & Case, D. A. (2004) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20033 · Cited by 2,507
KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs
Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Furumichi, M., Tanabe, M., & Hirakawa, M. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp896 · Cited by 2,322
Cited by
Molecular Docking and Structure-Based Drug Design Strategies
Ferreira, L., Dos Santos, R., Oliva, G., & Andricopulo, A. (2015) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules200713384 · Cited by 2,528
Chen, Y.-C. (2015) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2014.12.001 · Cited by 611
Variability in docking success rates due to dataset preparation.
Corbeil, C. R., Williams, C. I., & Labute, P. (2012) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-012-9570-1 · Cited by 469
Latest developments in molecular docking: 2010–2011 in review
Yuriev, E., & Ramsland, P. A. (2013) · Journal of Molecular Recognition · doi:10.1002/jmr.2266 · Cited by 344
Deep Learning Based Drug Screening for Novel Coronavirus 2019-nCov
Zhang, H., Saravanan, K. M., Yang, Y., Hossain, M. T., Li, J., Ren, X., Pan, Y., & Wei, Y. (2020) · Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12539-020-00376-6 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Lill, M. A., & Danielson, M. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
- Published
- 2010-10-30
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-19
- ISSN
- 0920-654X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-4951
- OpenAlex
- W2086779432
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 12.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computer-aided drug design platform using PyMOL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10822-010-9395-8
- The paper
- Lill, M. A., & Danielson, M. L. (2011). Computer-aided drug design platform using PyMOL. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-010-9395-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
