Cited by 5Computational Drug Discovery MethodsHeat shock proteins researchAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

Interaction with specific HSP90 residues as a scoring function: validation in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.

Santos-Martins, Diogo·2016·Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design

Abstract

Here is reported the development of a novel scoring function that performs remarkably well at identifying the native binding pose of a subset of HSP90 inhibitors containing aminopyrimidine or resorcinol based scaffolds. This scoring function is called PocketScore, and consists of the interaction energy between a ligand and three residues in the binding pocket: Asp93, Thr184 and a water molecule. We integrated PocketScore into a molecular docking workflow, and used it to participate in the Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) Grand Challenge 2015 (GC2015). PocketScore was able to rank 180 molecules of the GC2015 according to their binding affinity with satisfactory performance. These results indicate that the specific residues considered by PocketScore are determinant to properly model the interaction between HSP90 and its subset of inhibitors containing aminopyrimidine or resorcinol based scaffolds. Moreover, the development of PocketScore aimed at improving docking power while neglecting the prediction of binding affinities, suggesting that accurate identification of native binding poses is a determinant factor for the performance of virtual screens.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10822-016-9943-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 5

Authors
Santos-Martins, D.
Venue
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
Published
2016-08-22
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
731-742
ISSN
  • 0920-654X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-4951
OpenAlex
W2516896267
Cited by
5
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
FundaÇão para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/84922/2012)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
Hsp90 inhibitors, scoring functions, molecular docking, binding pocket residues, water-mediated interactions, virtual screening, binding affinity prediction
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Humans, Kinetics, Ligands, Protein Binding, Pyrimidines, Resorcinols, Thermodynamics, Drug Design, HSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins, Molecular Docking Simulation, Databases, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review