Interaction with specific HSP90 residues as a scoring function: validation in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Abstract
Here is reported the development of a novel scoring function that performs remarkably well at identifying the native binding pose of a subset of HSP90 inhibitors containing aminopyrimidine or resorcinol based scaffolds. This scoring function is called PocketScore, and consists of the interaction energy between a ligand and three residues in the binding pocket: Asp93, Thr184 and a water molecule. We integrated PocketScore into a molecular docking workflow, and used it to participate in the Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) Grand Challenge 2015 (GC2015). PocketScore was able to rank 180 molecules of the GC2015 according to their binding affinity with satisfactory performance. These results indicate that the specific residues considered by PocketScore are determinant to properly model the interaction between HSP90 and its subset of inhibitors containing aminopyrimidine or resorcinol based scaffolds. Moreover, the development of PocketScore aimed at improving docking power while neglecting the prediction of binding affinities, suggesting that accurate identification of native binding poses is a determinant factor for the performance of virtual screens.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A scoring function specific to Heat Shock Protein 90 (HSP90) was successfully designed and applied in VS.
“In a more recent work, a scoring function specific to Heat Shock Protein 90 (HSP90) was successfully designed and applied in VS (Santos-Martins, 2016).”
From Empirical scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening: applications, critical aspects, and challenges (2018) · cites this paper as Santos-Martins, 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Santos-Martins, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
- Published
- 2016-08-22
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 731-742
- ISSN
- 0920-654X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-4951
- OpenAlex
- W2516896267
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- FundaÇão para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/84922/2012)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- Hsp90 inhibitors, scoring functions, molecular docking, binding pocket residues, water-mediated interactions, virtual screening, binding affinity prediction
- MeSH terms
- Binding Sites, Humans, Kinetics, Ligands, Protein Binding, Pyrimidines, Resorcinols, Thermodynamics, Drug Design, HSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins, Molecular Docking Simulation, Databases, Chemical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review