Cited by 25Computational Drug Discovery MethodsGraph theory and applicationsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

Assessment of tautomer distribution using the condensed reaction graph approach

Gimadiev, T. R., Madzhidov, T. I., Nugmanov, R. I., Baskin, I. I., Antipin, I. S., Varnek, A.·2018·Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design

Abstract

We report the first direct QSPR modeling of equilibrium constants of tautomeric transformations (logK T ) in different solvents and at different temperatures, which do not require intermediate assessment of acidity (basicity) constants for all tautomeric forms. The key step of the modeling consisted in the merging of two tautomers in one sole molecular graph ("condensed reaction graph") which enables to compute molecular descriptors characterizing entire equilibrium. The support vector regression method was used to build the models. The training set consisted of 785 transformations belonging to 11 types of tautomeric reactions with equilibrium constants measured in different solvents and at different temperatures. The models obtained perform well both in cross-validation (Q 2 = 0.81 RMSE = 0.7 logK T units) and on two external test sets. Benchmarking studies demonstrate that our models outperform results obtained with DFT B3LYP/6-311 ++ G(d,p) and ChemAxon Tautomerizer applicable only in water at room temperature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10822-018-0101-6

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar approaches were used to develop predictive models for the equilibrium constants of tautomerization reactions.

    “Similar approaches were used to develop predictive models for the equilibrium constants of tautomerization reactions.161”

    From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [161]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gimadiev, T. R., Madzhidov, T. I., Nugmanov, R. I., Baskin, I. I., Antipin, I. S., & Varnek, A.
Affiliations
  • Kazan Federal University (RU)
  • Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
  • Université de Strasbourg (FR)
Corresponding author
Varnek, A.
Venue
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
Published
2018-01-29
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
401-414
ISSN
  • 0920-654X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-4951
OpenAlex
W2788621267
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Russian Science Support Foundation (14-43-00024)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Graph theory and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
tautomer equilibrium constants, QSPR modeling, tautomerism, solvent effects, temperature effects, support vector regression, molecular descriptors
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Isomerism, Solvents, Temperature, Thermodynamics, Water, Molecular Structure, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review