Cited by 574Child Development and Digital TechnologyEducational Methods and ImpactsLiteracy, Media, and Education

How and Why Parents Guide the Media Use of Young Children

Open access
Nikken, Peter, Schols, Marjon·2015·Journal of Child and Family Studies

Abstract

Children use electronic screens at ever younger ages, but there is still little empirical research on how and why parents mediate this media use. In line with Vygotsky's zone of proximal development, we explored whether children's media skills and media activities, next to parents' attitudes about media for children, and several child and parent-family characteristics, predicted parental mediation practices. Furthermore, we investigated children's use and ownership of electronic screens in the bedroom in relationship to the child's media skills. Data from an online survey among 896 Dutch parents with young children (0-7 years) showed that children's use and ownership of TV, game consoles, computers and touchscreens, primarily depended on their media skills and age, not on parent's attitudes about media for children. Only touchscreens were used more often by children, when parents perceived media as helpful in providing moments of rest for the child. In line with former studies, parents consistently applied co-use, supervision, active mediation, restrictive mediation, and monitoring, depending on positive and negative attitudes about media. The child's media skills and media activities, however, had stronger relationships with parental mediation styles, whereas age was not related. Canonical discriminant analysis, finally, captured how the five mediation strategies varied among infants, toddlers, pre-schoolers, and early childhood children, predominantly as a result of children's media skills, and media activities, i.e., playing educational games and passive entertainment use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Excessive screen time has been linked to deficits in cognitive development in children.

    “and excessive screen time has been linked to deficits in cognitive development in children (Nikken and Schols, 2015).”

    From The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Nikken and Schols, 2015

    The Results report how much time young children spend using screens, and the Discussion addresses parents’ views of media effects, but neither links screen time to cognitive-development deficits. Searches for cognitive development, excessive screen time, and developmental delays found no passage making that link (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 48 · Cited by 574

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Allison PD Millsap RE Maydeu-Olivares A Missing Data The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology 2009 London SAGE Publications Ltd 73 91
  2. American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Committee on Public Education Children, adolescents, and television Pediatrics 2001 107 423 426 10.1542/peds.107.2.423 11158483 · DOI
  3. American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Committee on Public Education Media use by children younger than 2 years Pediatrics 2011 128 1040 1045 10.1542/peds.2011-1753 22007002 · DOI
  4. Austin E Exploring the effects of active parental mediation of television content Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 1993 37 147 158 10.1080/08838159309364212 · DOI
  5. Barr R Zack E Muentener P García A Infants’ attention and responsiveness to television increases with prior exposure and parental interaction Infancy 2008 13 3 56 10.1080/15250000701779378 · DOI
  6. Böcking S Böcking T Parental mediation of television: Test of a German-speaking scale and findings on the impact of parental attitudes, sociodemographic and family-factors in German-speaking Switzerland Journal of Children and Media 2009 3 286 302 10.1080/17482790902999959 · DOI
  7. Chiong C Shuler C Learning: Is there an app for that? Investigations of young children’s usage and learning with mobile devices and apps 2010 New York The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop
  8. Craig L Does father care mean fathers share? A comparison of how mothers and fathers in intact families spend time with children Gender and Society 2006 20 259 281 10.1177/0891243205285212 · DOI
  9. Cranmer S Children and young people’s uses of the internet for homework Learning Media and Technology 2006 31 301 315 10.1080/17439880600893358 · DOI
  10. Das M Ester P Kaczmirek L Social research and the internet: Advances in applied methods and new research strategies 2010 Boca Raton Taylor & Francis
  11. Haines J O’Brien A McDonald J Goldman RE Evans-Schmidt M Price S King S Sherry B Taveras EM Television viewing and televisions in bedrooms: Perceptions of racial/ethnic minority parents of young children Journal of Child and Family Studies 2013 22 749 756 10.1007/s10826-012-9629-6 · DOI
  12. Ito M Baumer S Bittanti M Boyd D Cody R Herr-Stephenson B Horst H Lange P Mahendran D Martinez K Pascoe C Perkel D Robinson L Sims C Tripp L Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media 2010 Cambridge Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  13. Kim J Anderson J Mother-child shared reading with print and digital texts Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 2008 8 213 245 10.1177/1468798408091855 · DOI
  14. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
  15. Küter-Luks T Heuvelman A Peters O Making Dutch pupils media conscious: Preadolescents’ self-assessment of possible media risks and the need for media education Learning Media and Technology 2011 36 295 313 10.1080/17439884.2010.549826 · DOI
  16. Lee S Chae Y Children’s internet use in a family context: Influence on family relationships and parental mediation CyberPsychology and Behavior 2007 10 640 644 10.1089/cpb.2007.9975 17927531 · DOI
  17. Marsh, J. (2010). Childhood, culture and creativity: A literature review. Newcastle: Creativity, Culture and Education. http://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/childhood-culture-and-creativity-a-literature-review. Accessed May 2014.
  18. Nikken P Jansz J Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: A comparison of the reports by parents and children Learning Media and Technology 2006 31 181 202 10.1080/17439880600756803 · DOI
  19. Nikken P Jansz J Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children’s internet use Learning Media and Technology 2013 39 250 266 10.1080/17439884.2013.782038 · DOI
  20. Priewasser B Roessler J Perner J Competition as rational action: Why young children cannot appreciate competitive games? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2012 116 545 559 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.008 23182381 PMC3778405 · DOI
  21. Schofield Clark L Parental mediation theory for the digital age Communication Theory 2011 21 323 343 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x · DOI
  22. Sonck N Nikken P De Haan J Determinants of internet mediation: A comparison of the reports by parents and children Journal of Children and Media 2013 7 96 113 10.1080/17482798.2012.739806 · DOI
  23. Takeuchi L Families matter: Designing media for a digital age 2011 New York The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop
  24. Vaala S The nature and predictive value of mothers’ beliefs regarding infants’ and toddlers’ TV/video viewing: Applying the integrative model of behavioral prediction Media Psychology 2014 17 282 310 10.1080/15213269.2013.872995 25431537 PMC4243828 · DOI
  25. Vaala S Hornik R Predicting US infants’ and toddlers’ TV/video viewing rates: Mothers’ cognitions and structural life circumstances Journal of Children and Media 2014 8 163 182 10.1080/17482798.2013.824494 25489335 PMC4256051 · DOI
  26. Valkenburg P Vroone M Developmental changes in infants’ and toddlers’ attention to television entertainment Communication Research 2004 31 288 311 10.1177/0093650204263435 · DOI
  27. Van der Voort T Nikken P Van Lil J Determinants of parental guidance of children’s television viewing: A Dutch replication study Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 1992 36 61 74 10.1080/08838159209364154 · DOI
  28. Vandewater EA Rideout VJ Wartella EA Huang X Lee JH Shim M Digital childhood: Electronic media and technology use among infants, toddlers, and preschoolers Pediatrics 2007 119 e1006 e1015 10.1542/peds.2006-1804 17473074 · DOI
  29. Vygotsky LS Mind in society 1978 Cambridge Harvard University Press
  30. Vygotsky LS Thought and language 1986 Cambridge MIT Press
  31. Warren R In words and deeds: Parental involvement and mediation of children’s television viewing The Journal of Family Communication 2001 1 211 231 10.1207/S15327698JFC0104_01 · DOI
  32. Warren R Parental mediation of preschool children’s television viewing Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 2003 47 394 417 10.1207/s15506878jobem4703_5 · DOI
  33. Warren R Parental mediation of children’s television viewing in low-income families Journal of Communication 2005 55 847 863 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03026.x · DOI

Authors
Nikken, P., & Schols, M.
Affiliations
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Nikken, Peter
Venue
Journal of Child and Family Studies
Published
2015-02-24
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
3423-3435
ISSN
  • 1062-1024 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2843
OpenAlex
W1995627278
Cited by
574
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
108.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child and Family Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
parental mediation, children's media use, young children, media competence, zone of proximal development, co-use, active mediation, restrictive mediation, monitoring, touch screen, game-based learning, developmental differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review