Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Case, Phases, and Nominative/Accusative Conversion in Japanese

Takahashi, Masahiko·2010·Journal of East Asian Linguistics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10831-010-9063-y

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 92 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Aoyagi Hiroshi. (2006) Nihongo-no joshi-to kinou hanchuu [Particles in Japanese and functional categories]. Hituzi Syobo, Tokyo
  2. Bošković, Željko. Forthcoming. On unvalued uninterpretable features. In Proceedings of the north east linguistic society 39.
  3. Hiraiwa, Ken. 2001. Multiple Agree and the defective intervention constraint in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 1st HUMIT student conference in language research, ed. Nathan Lance, Albert Costa, Javier Martin-Gonzalez, Ora Matushansky, and Adam Szczegielniak, 67–80. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
  4. Hornstein Norbert. (1995) Logical form: From GB to minimalism. Cambridge MA, Blackwell
  5. Inoue Kazuko. (1976) Henkei bumpou to nihongo [Transformational grammar and Japanese]. Taishukan, Tokyo
  6. Kageyama Taro. (1993) Bunpou to Gokeisei [Grammar and word formation]. Hituzi Syobo, Tokyo
  7. Kasai Hironobu. (2004) The emergence of phase. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 51–74
  8. Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1994. Nominative objects: The role of TP in Japanese. In Formal approaches to Japanese linguistics 1, ed. Masatoshi Koizumi and Hiroyuki Ura, 211–230. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
  9. Kuno Susumu. (1973) The structure of the Japanese language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
  10. Miyagawa Shigeru. (1997) Against optional scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 1–26
  11. Miyagawa, Shigeru. Forthcoming a. Optionality. In The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism, ed. Cedrix Boeckx. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Morita, Yoshiyuki. 1971. Dake, bakari no Yoohoo [Usage of dake and bakari]. In Bulletin of the Institute of Language Teaching 10: 1–27. Tokyo: Waseda University.
  13. Niinuma, Fumikazu. 1999. On nominative objects and overt A-movement in Japanese. In Proceedings of eastern conference on linguistics 99, ed. Rebecca Daly and Anastatia Riehl, 149–160. Cornell University.
  14. Nomura, Masashi. 2005b. Remarks on the scope of nominative objects in Japanese. In Proceedings of the sixth tokyo psycholinguistics conference, ed. Yukio Otsu. 269–292. Tokyo: Hituzi Publishers.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Takahashi, M.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Takahashi, Masahiko
Venue
Journal of East Asian Linguistics
Published
2010-10-30
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
319-355
ISSN
  • 0925-8558 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8560
OpenAlex
W2062282001
Cited by
64
References
92
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 23
FWCI
73.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Journal of East Asian Linguistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
phase, Japanese, quantifier raising, landing sites, Minimalist Program

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Case, Phases, and Nominative/Accusative Conversion in Japanese. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10831-010-9063-y
The paper
Takahashi, M. (2010). Case, Phases, and Nominative/Accusative Conversion in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-010-9063-y

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.