Cited by 23Educational Assessment and ImprovementStudent Assessment and FeedbackInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Student-involved data use: Establishing the evidence base

Jimerson, Jo Beth, Reames, Ellen·2015·Journal of Educational Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10833-015-9246-4

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While considerable attention has been paid to the use of data by school leaders and teachers, less attention has been paid to data use by policy-makers and by students.

    “While considerable attention has been paid to the use of data by school leaders and teachers, less attention has been paid to data use by policy-makers and by students.”

    From Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps (2019) · cites this paper as Jimerson and Reames 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jimerson, J. B., & Reames, E.
Affiliations
  • Texas Christian University (US)
  • Auburn University (US)
Corresponding author
Jimerson, Jo Beth
Venue
Journal of Educational Change
Published
2015-04-14
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
281-304
ISSN
  • 1389-2843 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1812
OpenAlex
W2065259284
Cited by
23
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Change (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
student self-assessment, Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, PDSA cycle, reflective practice, data-driven instruction, evidence base, educational outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review