Nearly uniform failure of atrial flutter ablation and continuation of antiarrhythmic agents (hybrid therapy) for the long-term control of atrial fibrillation
Abstract
Background Ablation for atrial flutter and continued pharmacologic therapy (hybrid therapy) is a management strategy when treatment with class I antiarrhythmic drugs organize atrial fibrillation (AF) into flutter. Previous studies with 2-3-year follow-up have reported satisfactory control of AF burden.Objective We evaluated the effectiveness of hybrid therapy after a follow-up of 5 years. We hypothesized that longer term follow-up would demonstrate eventual failure of this strategy to control AF.Methods A consecutive, retrospective evaluation of all first time ablations of right atrial flutter at the University of Pennsylvania between August 2003 and August 2005 was performed (n = 179). The study population consisted of 33 patients who had atrial flutter only after treatment of AF with class I antiarrhythmic drugs and was continued on them post-ablation. Follow-up data were obtained by reviewing records from our institution, from referring cardiologists, and from direct patient questionnaires.Results Atrial fibrillation recurrence was noted in 28 of 31 patients (90.3 %) who completed 5 years of follow-up. AF recurrence typically resulted in significant symptoms, although 21 % developed persistent AF and were eventually minimally symptomatic on a rate control strategy. A wide range of time to recurrence was observed (0.2-64.5 months) with 39 % recurring greater than 2 years post-ablation.Conclusion Hybrid therapy is not effective for long-term control of AF. Patients should be counseled about the likelihood of eventual AF recurrence and anticoagulation should be maintained indefinitely when this strategy is used.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recurrent AF is a concern in the long term after combining cavotricuspid isthmus ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs.
“although recurrent AF is a concern in the long term.837, 838”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [837]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Anastasio, N., Frankel, D. S., Deyell, M. W., Zado, E., Gerstenfeld, E. P., Dixit, S., Cooper, J., Lin, D., Marchlinski, F. E., & Callans, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Callans, David J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
- Published
- 2012-05-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-61
- ISSN
- 1383-875X (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8595
- OpenAlex
- W2141909745
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
- Keywords
- atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, hybrid therapy, catheter ablation, class I antiarrhythmic drugs, atrial fibrillation recurrence, long-term follow-up, persistent atrial fibrillation, rate control, anticoagulation, right atrial flutter
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Combined Modality Therapy, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Catheter Ablation, Treatment Failure, Statistics, Nonparametric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review