Cited by 15Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Nearly uniform failure of atrial flutter ablation and continuation of antiarrhythmic agents (hybrid therapy) for the long-term control of atrial fibrillation

Anastasio, Nicholas, Frankel, David S., Deyell, Marc W., Zado, Erica, Gerstenfeld, Edward P., Dixit, Sanjay, Cooper, Joshua, Lin, David +2 more·2012·Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

Abstract

Background Ablation for atrial flutter and continued pharmacologic therapy (hybrid therapy) is a management strategy when treatment with class I antiarrhythmic drugs organize atrial fibrillation (AF) into flutter. Previous studies with 2-3-year follow-up have reported satisfactory control of AF burden.Objective We evaluated the effectiveness of hybrid therapy after a follow-up of 5 years. We hypothesized that longer term follow-up would demonstrate eventual failure of this strategy to control AF.Methods A consecutive, retrospective evaluation of all first time ablations of right atrial flutter at the University of Pennsylvania between August 2003 and August 2005 was performed (n = 179). The study population consisted of 33 patients who had atrial flutter only after treatment of AF with class I antiarrhythmic drugs and was continued on them post-ablation. Follow-up data were obtained by reviewing records from our institution, from referring cardiologists, and from direct patient questionnaires.Results Atrial fibrillation recurrence was noted in 28 of 31 patients (90.3 %) who completed 5 years of follow-up. AF recurrence typically resulted in significant symptoms, although 21 % developed persistent AF and were eventually minimally symptomatic on a rate control strategy. A wide range of time to recurrence was observed (0.2-64.5 months) with 39 % recurring greater than 2 years post-ablation.Conclusion Hybrid therapy is not effective for long-term control of AF. Patients should be counseled about the likelihood of eventual AF recurrence and anticoagulation should be maintained indefinitely when this strategy is used.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10840-012-9679-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 15

Authors
Anastasio, N., Frankel, D. S., Deyell, M. W., Zado, E., Gerstenfeld, E. P., Dixit, S., Cooper, J., Lin, D., Marchlinski, F. E., & Callans, D. J.
Affiliations
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Callans, David J.
Venue
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Published
2012-05-04
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
57-61
ISSN
  • 1383-875X (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8595
OpenAlex
W2141909745
Cited by
15
References
14
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, hybrid therapy, catheter ablation, class I antiarrhythmic drugs, atrial fibrillation recurrence, long-term follow-up, persistent atrial fibrillation, rate control, anticoagulation, right atrial flutter
MeSH terms
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Combined Modality Therapy, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Catheter Ablation, Treatment Failure, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review