Cited by 17Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Epidemiology and definition of inappropriate sinus tachycardia

Pellegrini, Cara N., Scheinman, Melvin M.·2016·Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

Abstract

Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) is a clinical syndrome lacking formal diagnostic criteria. It is generally defined as an elevated resting heart rate (HR; >90-100 bpm) with an exaggerated response to physical or emotional stress and a clearly sinus mechanism. Clinical manifestations are broad from a complete lack of symptoms to incapacitating incessant tachycardia. Now understood to be relatively prevalent, it is observed to have a generally benign prognosis, though symptoms may persist for years. Whether IST is a single discrete entity or a heterogeneous condition with overlap to other syndromes such as postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome remains a matter of debate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10840-015-0039-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inappropriate sinus tachycardia is sometimes confused with POTS, but occurs independent of body position.

    “Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) is sometimes confused with POTS, but occurs independent of body position (66).”

    From Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [66]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pellegrini, C. N., & Scheinman, M. M.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Pellegrini, Cara N.
Venue
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Published
2015-08-27
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
29-32
ISSN
  • 1383-875X (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8595
OpenAlex
W1722001828
Cited by
17
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Keywords
inappropriate sinus tachycardia, prevalence, diagnostic criteria, resting heart rate, prognosis, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, sinus rhythm, clinical features
MeSH terms
Diagnosis, Differential, Heart Rate, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Syndrome, Tachycardia, Sinus, Comorbidity, Causality, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Evidence-Based Medicine, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review