Epidemiology and definition of inappropriate sinus tachycardia
Abstract
Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) is a clinical syndrome lacking formal diagnostic criteria. It is generally defined as an elevated resting heart rate (HR; >90-100 bpm) with an exaggerated response to physical or emotional stress and a clearly sinus mechanism. Clinical manifestations are broad from a complete lack of symptoms to incapacitating incessant tachycardia. Now understood to be relatively prevalent, it is observed to have a generally benign prognosis, though symptoms may persist for years. Whether IST is a single discrete entity or a heterogeneous condition with overlap to other syndromes such as postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome remains a matter of debate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inappropriate sinus tachycardia is sometimes confused with POTS, but occurs independent of body position.
“Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) is sometimes confused with POTS, but occurs independent of body position (66).”
From Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [66]
Cites
Chiale, P. A., Garro, H. A., Schmidberg, J., Sánchez, R. A., Acunzo, R. S., Lago, M., Levy, G., & Levin, M. (2006) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.06.011 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome
Bryarly, M., Phillips, L. T., Fu, Q., Vernino, S., & Levine, B. D. (2019) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.059 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Baruscotti, M., Bianco, E., Bucchi, A., & DiFrancesco, D. (2016) · Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology · doi:10.1007/s10840-015-0097-y · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pellegrini, C. N., & Scheinman, M. M.
- Affiliations
- San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pellegrini, Cara N.
- Venue
- Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
- Published
- 2015-08-27
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-32
- ISSN
- 1383-875X (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8595
- OpenAlex
- W1722001828
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Keywords
- inappropriate sinus tachycardia, prevalence, diagnostic criteria, resting heart rate, prognosis, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, sinus rhythm, clinical features
- MeSH terms
- Diagnosis, Differential, Heart Rate, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Syndrome, Tachycardia, Sinus, Comorbidity, Causality, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Evidence-Based Medicine, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome, Symptom Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review