The DOI matches its Crossref record; 142 of the 142 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine learning techniques in additive manufacturing: a state of the art review on design, processes and production control
Open accessAbstract
For several industries, the traditional manufacturing processes are time-consuming and uneconomical due to the absence of the right tool to produce the products. In a couple of years, machine learning (ML) algorithms have become more prevalent in manufacturing to develop items and products with reduced labor cost, time, and effort. Digitalization with cutting-edge manufacturing methods and massive data availability have further boosted the necessity and interest in integrating ML and optimization techniques to enhance product quality. ML integrated manufacturing methods increase acceptance of new approaches, save time, energy, and resources, and avoid waste. ML integrated assembly processes help creating what is known as smart manufacturing, where technology automatically adjusts any errors in real-time to prevent any spillage. Though manufacturing sectors use different techniques and tools for computing, recent methods such as the ML and data mining techniques are instrumental in solving challenging industrial and research problems. Therefore, this paper discusses the current state of ML technique, focusing on modern manufacturing methods i.e., additive manufacturing. The various categories especially focus on design, processes and production control of additive manufacturing are described in the form of state of the art review.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.
Rosenblatt, F. (1958) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0042519 · Cited by 12,280 · cited 12×
“Niu et al. (2017) conducted comparison research to assess the emission characteristics of a CRDI-assisted marine diesel engine using ANN and support vector machines (SVM-Regression).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIndustry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies
Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S., & Ayala, N. F. (2019) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,958
Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization
Bendsøe, M. P., & Sigmund, O. (1999) · Archive of Applied Mechanics (Ingenieur Archiv) · doi:10.1007/s004190050248 · Cited by 2,827
Feature selection for high-dimensional data: a fast correlation-based filter solution
Yu, L., & Liu, H. (2003) · Cited by 2,305
30 years of adaptive neural networks: perceptron, Madaline, and backpropagation
Widrow, B., & Lehr, M. A. (1990) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.58323 · Cited by 2,242
The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance
Dalenogare, L. S., Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019 · Cited by 2,201
Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability
Ghobakhloo, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119869 · Cited by 2,115
Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs
Guo, N., & Leu, M. C. (2013) · Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11465-013-0248-8 · Cited by 2,073
Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints
Thompson, M. K., Moroni, G., Vaneker, T., Fadel, G., Campbell, R. I., Gibson, I., Bernard, A., Schulz, J., Graf, P., Ahuja, B., et al. (2016) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004 · Cited by 2,017
Additive Manufacturing Technologies
Gibson, I., Rosen, D., Stucker, B., & Khorasani, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56127-7 · Cited by 1,873
Cited by
Ukwaththa, J., Herath, S., & Meddage, D. P. P. (2024) · Materials Today Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110294 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, S., Gopi, T., Harikeerthana, N., Gupta, M. K., Gaur, V., Krolczyk, G. M., & Wu, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
- Published
- 2022-10-10
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-55
- ISSN
- 0956-5515 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8145
- OpenAlex
- W4304161220
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 142
- FWCI
- 16.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning techniques in additive manufacturing: a state of the art review on design, processes and production control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10845-022-02029-5
- The paper
- Kumar, S., Gopi, T., Harikeerthana, N., Gupta, M. K., Gaur, V., Krolczyk, G. M., & Wu, C. (2023). Machine learning techniques in additive manufacturing: a state of the art review on design, processes and production control. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-02029-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.