Towards a knowledge graph framework for ad hoc analysis in manufacturing
Open accessAbstract
The development of artificial intelligence models for data driven decision making has a lot of potential for the manufacturing sector. Nevertheless, applications in industry are currently limited to the actionable insights one can discover from the available data and knowledge of a manufacturing system. We call the process to obtain such insights “ad hoc analysis”. Ad hoc analysis at system level is very complex in an industrial setting due to the inherent heterogeneity of data and existence of data silos, the lack of information and knowledge formalization, and the inability to meaningfully and efficiently reason about the data, information and knowledge. In this paper, we provide and outline a framework for ad hoc analysis in manufacturing based on knowledge graphs and influenced by the metamodelling paradigm. We derive its requirements and key elements from an analysis of several industry application cases. We show how manufacturing data, information and knowledge can be combined and made actionable using this framework. The framework supports workflows and tools for the data consumer (i.e., data scientist), and for the knowledge engineer. Furthermore, we show how the framework is integrated with existing data sources. Then, we discuss how we applied the framework to several application cases. We discuss how the framework contributes when applied, and what challenges still remain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Meyers et al. (2023) use knowledge graphs for knowledge representation, providing a structure for managing heterogeneous data in smart manufacturing systems.
“Similarly, Meyers et al. (2023) focus on knowledge representation through knowledge graphs, which provide a structure for managing heterogeneous data in smart manufacturing systems [21].”
From Towards enhanced cybersecurity in industrial control systems: a systematic review of context-based modeling, digital twins, and machine learning approaches (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
Knowledge graphs significantly improve anomaly detection capabilities when used with context-aware digital twins.
“Meyers et al. (2023) demonstrated that knowledge graphs significantly improve anomaly detection capabilities when used with context-aware digital twins [21].”
From Towards enhanced cybersecurity in industrial control systems: a systematic review of context-based modeling, digital twins, and machine learning approaches (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
Cites
Generating Digital Twin Models using Knowledge Graphs for Industrial Production Lines
Banerjee, A., Dalal, R., Mittal, S., & Joshi, K. P. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference · doi:10.1145/3091478.3162383 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
ModelOps: Cloud-Based Lifecycle Management for Reliable and Trusted AI
Hummer, W., Muthusamy, V., Rausch, T., Dube, P., El Maghraoui, K., Murthi, A., & Oum, P. (2019) · 2019 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering (IC2E) · doi:10.1109/ic2e.2019.00025 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abraham, D., Erceylan, G., Gkioulos, V., & Houmb, S. H. (2025) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-025-01158-1 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Meyers, B., Vangheluwe, H., Lietaert, P., Vanderhulst, G., Van Noten, J., Schaffers, M., Maes, D., & Gadeyne, K.
- Affiliations
- Flanders Make (Belgium) (BE)
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Meyers, Bart
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
- Published
- 2024-02-29
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3731-3752
- ISSN
- 0956-5515 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8145
- OpenAlex
- W4392284516
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- VLAIO (HBC.2019.0079)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (101000165)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Knowledge Management and Technology
- Keywords
- knowledge graphs, ad hoc analysis, manufacturing industry, metamodeling, data silos, knowledge engineering, data-driven decision making, knowledge representation, data heterogeneity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review