Cited by 23Digital Transformation in IndustrySemantic Web and OntologiesKnowledge Management and Technology

Towards a knowledge graph framework for ad hoc analysis in manufacturing

Open access
Meyers, Bart, Vangheluwe, Hans, Lietaert, Pieter, Vanderhulst, Geert, Van Noten, Johan, Schaffers, Michel, Maes, Davy, Gadeyne, Klaas·2024·Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence models for data driven decision making has a lot of potential for the manufacturing sector. Nevertheless, applications in industry are currently limited to the actionable insights one can discover from the available data and knowledge of a manufacturing system. We call the process to obtain such insights “ad hoc analysis”. Ad hoc analysis at system level is very complex in an industrial setting due to the inherent heterogeneity of data and existence of data silos, the lack of information and knowledge formalization, and the inability to meaningfully and efficiently reason about the data, information and knowledge. In this paper, we provide and outline a framework for ad hoc analysis in manufacturing based on knowledge graphs and influenced by the metamodelling paradigm. We derive its requirements and key elements from an analysis of several industry application cases. We show how manufacturing data, information and knowledge can be combined and made actionable using this framework. The framework supports workflows and tools for the data consumer (i.e., data scientist), and for the knowledge engineer. Furthermore, we show how the framework is integrated with existing data sources. Then, we discuss how we applied the framework to several application cases. We discuss how the framework contributes when applied, and what challenges still remain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10845-023-02319-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyers, B., Vangheluwe, H., Lietaert, P., Vanderhulst, G., Van Noten, J., Schaffers, M., Maes, D., & Gadeyne, K.
Affiliations
  • Flanders Make (Belgium) (BE)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
Corresponding author
Meyers, Bart
Venue
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
Published
2024-02-29
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
3731-3752
ISSN
  • 0956-5515 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8145
OpenAlex
W4392284516
Cited by
23
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • VLAIO (HBC.2019.0079)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (101000165)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Knowledge Management and Technology
Keywords
knowledge graphs, ad hoc analysis, manufacturing industry, metamodeling, data silos, knowledge engineering, data-driven decision making, knowledge representation, data heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review